[TheBattman]

That is exactly what makes Q appear to be nothing more than a conspiracy nut job. His posts are so enigmatic that they make extremely vague accusations/theories that are more left to wild speculation by the public (and the eager tinfoil-had conspiracy nuts) runs in random and insanely idiotic (at times) directions with it.

They are so vague as to be pretty much pointless.

And without some kind of real, tangible evidence/document dump - its just the bloviating of an armchair nut job... Making this guy look pretty brilliant:

[Cold Heart]

Not that guy. He was eaten. I saw it.

[yesthatjallen]

I, myself, am still waiting for verifiable evidence and confirmation.

This Q post seems to be speaking to people of my ilk. 'Where's the proof?', I ask, and Q answers, "Do you really believe nothing is being done?"

What I do find tantalizing is that recently there have been a few high level exits from the FBI and DoJ.

Do they fit with a long pattern of resignations from past administrations or are they averaging more than normal?

I'd like someone to find the answer to that question.

I'm keeping a cautions open mind.

Time will tell.

[sargon]

I remain agnostic as to the validity of Q's posts. But even if they're not "real", they provide ample entertainment value.

What I'm more alarmed by is the vehemence which skeptics display in their insistence that Q is a fraud, and the derision that they mete out to those who happen to be more open to the possibility that Q might be for real.

I do find much of the mockery of Q and Q-believers to be overtly mean-spirited, and consequently, I tend to sympathize with those who are targeted by it...