Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

“...I don’t see AT&T as a social media company, so don’t see the link implied by “AT&T>GOOG/FB/etc.”
_____________

To my mind, it implies that social media may find itself regulated as a public communications company. Don’t know how the process works, though. FCC has that power? Who/what defines a corporation as subject to regulation? Is it simply a unilateral government action defined by size<>function?


128 posted on 01/26/2018 5:26:58 AM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: reformedliberal
-- To my mind, it implies that social media may find itself regulated as a public communications company. Don't know how the process works ... --

The regulations depend on the business. I see your point though, telecom companies (AT&T) are regulated, and maybe it's time to somehow regulate social media (Google/FB).

FCC regulates telecom, becuase telecom is viewed as a monopoly. Consumers generally have only one company hanging phone lines.

Congress makes the law, and passes details to a regulatory agency. I don't know much about that area of law, just where to find it.

130 posted on 01/26/2018 5:36:18 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson