Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Department won't disclose details on Mueller ethics waiver (GRANTED)
Politico ^ | December 12, 2017 | Streiff

Posted on 12/12/2017 9:06:04 AM PST by Golden Eagle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: DesertRhino

Exactly, this is a major torpedo to the broadside of Mueller and Rosenstein’s already sinking ship. And what the reasons are they have or had listed as the conflicts of interest are already OBE by the massive conflicts being disclosed.

The point made going forward should be “The DOJ has already found and officially recorded that Mueller has a conflict of interest in being appointed Special Counsel.”


21 posted on 12/12/2017 9:56:56 AM PST by Golden Eagle (Donald Trump: "There's a lot of people disappointed in the Justice department, including me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

22 posted on 12/12/2017 10:04:12 AM PST by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

Rosenstein did select Mueller. I read that Mueller reportedly has taken out insurance (I assume it to be swamp liability ins.), so it’s no surprise that will suffice as a supplement to the swamp membership “waiver”.


23 posted on 12/12/2017 10:08:42 AM PST by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public education & academia= the farm team for more Marxists coming, infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

It says he is Associate Deputy AG which just so happens to be the position that Ohr was recently removed from. Dont think the timelines are the same, so there may be several of them, and from what we’ve seen so far, all may be crooked.


24 posted on 12/12/2017 10:09:20 AM PST by Golden Eagle (Donald Trump: "There's a lot of people disappointed in the Justice department, including me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The entire purpose of special counsels is to avoid the appearance of politicization of the investigation, and therefor the exact last place waivers for conflicts of interest should be allowed.
25 posted on 12/12/2017 10:30:17 AM PST by Golden Eagle (Donald Trump: "There's a lot of people disappointed in the Justice department, including me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

It all stinketh to the high heavens.


26 posted on 12/12/2017 10:31:30 AM PST by Rapscallion (Politics just makes us hate each other. It's un-christian and un-American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

I don’t think Mueller needed an ethics waiver.

He does not have any ethics.


27 posted on 12/12/2017 10:32:09 AM PST by joshua c (To disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

This just confirms that the fix is in.

NimRod Rosenstein couldn’t find a Special Counsel without a conflict of interest?

Nope, he wanted Mueller, all part of the plan.


28 posted on 12/12/2017 10:36:52 AM PST by joshua c (To disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Slate likes that Scott Schools is "unknown".

The Most Important Unknown Person in D.C.

29 posted on 12/12/2017 10:46:01 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Corporate Law

ping


30 posted on 12/12/2017 10:48:04 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joshua c

I think it’s sort of presumed when one passes the bar exam. How many lawyers have ethics? Lawyerticians even less so.


31 posted on 12/12/2017 11:11:37 AM PST by Pollard (TRUMP 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Good find. From the article:

- while Schools’ job is one that “almost nobody outside of DOJ knows about or understands,” in the words of Obama-era DOJ official Kathryn Ruemmler, it has never been more crucial to maintaining the department’s stability. -

“Stability” being the key word, that could be easily replaced with many others to bring the article up to current. I’d probably go with “corruption.”


32 posted on 12/12/2017 11:16:46 AM PST by Golden Eagle (Donald Trump: "There's a lot of people disappointed in the Justice department, including me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

It seems that Mueller and most of his staff should have recused themselves because of conflicts of interest. But only Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III did so.

Spit.


33 posted on 12/12/2017 12:00:47 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Many believe that Sessions was double crossed by Rosenstein, who was the key player in getting Comey fired (as Comey worked directly for him) and the subsequent appointment of Mueller.

Did Rosenstein pressure Sessions to recuse himself from Russia probe to ultimately get Mueller appointed Special Counsel?

http://netrightdaily.com/2017/12/did-rosenstein-pressure-sessions-to-recuse-himself/


34 posted on 12/12/2017 12:23:49 PM PST by Golden Eagle (Donald Trump: "There's a lot of people disappointed in the Justice department, including me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

If Trump isn’t willing to do what it takes to make his domestic enemy stop their assault, he ought to just throw in the towel and stop wasting his time.

He isn’t even in control of his own Executive Agencies, DOJ, or the Armed Forces.

This is a joke.


35 posted on 12/12/2017 2:23:29 PM PST by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA-SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS-CLOSE ALL MOSQUES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

btt


36 posted on 12/13/2017 10:37:42 AM PST by a little elbow grease (I was married by a judge. I should have asked for a jury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson