Why Nato must defend women's rights

UK Guraridan ^ | December 10, 2017 | Jens Stoltenberg and Angelina Jolie

[C19fan]

All violence against women betrays the fundamental promise in the UN Charter of equal rights and dignity for women. It is one of the prime reasons why women remain in a subordinate position in relation to men in most parts of the world.

When this violence is committed as an act of war it tears apart families, creates mass displacement, and makes peace and reconciliation far harder to achieve. In fact, it is often designed expressly to achieve those goals as part of a military strategy.

[C19fan]

Yea that Angelina Jolie. Even worse the co-author is the NATO General Secretary. Cue the laughing Putin gif.

[oldplayer]

I’m so silly! I expected this to be an article on the right of women in NATO countries to walk down streets safely without fear of being attacked sexually by low information immigrants.

[hal ogen]

How about men’s rights, you sexist feminist fascist pigs?

[ClearCase_guy]

the fundamental promise in the UN Charter of equal rights and dignity for women

The article hints that NATO is somehow the military arm of the UN and that a primary mission of NATO is to defend the UN Charter.

I guess globalists just think like that.

[heshtesh]

How about men’s rights, you sexist feminist fascist pigs?

I take it you are in fact speaking to the rights for men of color?

[Arm_Bears]

Does this mean that NATO will be invading and occupying the US Capitol Building?

[ek_hornbeck]

NATO was chartered as a mutual defense alliance among western nations. It isn’t NATO’s task to nation-build in the name of “women’s rights” or any other alleged rights elsewhere in the world.

[WKUHilltopper]

So...does this mean NATO will do something about their Islamic barbarians who are raping and beating women in Europe? Pffft...didn’t think so. So, this too, can be blown out of their a$$.

[eyeamok]

Maybe President Trump should appoint her as Ambassador to Egypt and send her there to do Jewish outreach.

[mewzilla]

Tell it to Turkey.

[Alberta's Child]

In a globalist world, NATO serves only one purpose: it's the mechanism that is used to justify military intervention in situations where the U.N. Security Council doesn't sanction military intervention on its own.

See Kosovo/Serbia as a perfect case in point.

[ek_hornbeck]

NATO will do something about their Islamic barbarians who are raping and beating women in Europe

Liberal "logic" on foreign policy and so-called human rights has always been murky. Keeping Third World people out of the US and Europe to protect women and children would be "racist." Bombing Third World countries in the name of "protecting women and children" is humanitarian.

[wbill]

I always thought that NATO was created to defend West Germany and points east from Russian Tanks.

Guess that times have changed.

[hal ogen]

Everyone has some “color”.

[robowombat]

Yes indeed, and there used to be a number of Freepers who thought our sqaulid war with Serbia was a glorius event. Not so much today

[ex91B10]

>>All violence against women betrays the fundamental promise in the UN Charter... <<

Talk to me when you address GM and muslim behavior towards women.

[Little Ray]

NATO doesn’t exist to protect “women’s rights” or “human rights” or any other crap like that.

It exists to protect its members from attack, mostly from the (nonexistent) Warsaw Pact.

Where do they find idiots like that?