Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons

You are remarkably consistent in the absence of logic in your arguments.

I’m not going back to Search, but I believe You said that if I had the opinion that woody sneaked a bit of a wink to his lust for young girls into his oeuvre, it necessitated other filmmakers (orson welles?) being exactly like their characters. Please show me any X and Y logic there.

If we couldn’t comment on activities where none of us were present, we couldn’t have message boards. I believe what Dylan has written about her abuse at the hands of her father. Her brother’s passionate stance and action solidify my belief. I did not have to be there in order to believe.

We never spoke on whether I would watch a Woody Allen film. As a young girl I was a fan. Good thing he didn’t know me then, isn’t it? Now, I choose not to voluntarily see his films. One night I was surfing and came upon a movie and loved it, it was as if it was written for me personally. Watched the rest of it before learning it was his fantasy time travel movie about Paris, and I was disgusted I’d watched it. But yes, I realize lots of art and literature were produced by people who were not good. We all have to live with that. Half the time we have no idea something we enjoyed was created by a relative monster. I would prefer not to give living pedophiles any $ so I do what I can.


72 posted on 12/11/2017 2:45:14 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: Yaelle
I am consistent in that I post FACTS, use logic, and though my opinions and yes, FACTS, don't match up with yours, that doesn't mean that I am wrong, illogical, nor whatever other spurious things about me, that you may care to post.

You claimed that a character in some movie, that you have no idea what it was titled, some how "proved" that Woody did something to Dylan.

So I used Orson Welles ( someone else who is famous for writing, directing, and acting in his movies ) and specifically, "CITIZEN KANE", disproving that just because an autuer does all of the previous stated things, does NOT translate into it being, in some way, auto-biographical.

I truly hope that the above explanation helps you to now understand it all. As I stated, it is the Aristotelian logic/debate method.

Mia coached Dylan and also Ronan, back then, and now they are both convinced that what they say is true., Nobody who was there, at the time, says it is true!

Like you, I am NOT going to do a search, but you did post that you would never see one of his movies now. And frankly, whatever movies of Woody's you may have seen and enjoyed, in the past, don'/t count for much, since you can't remember the titles of them.

Oh good grief...you don't even know the title of a movie you watched on T.V. and loved ( it's MIDNIGHT IN PARIS and a great movie ), that you did NOT pay for, and now hate.

Maybe YOU don't know about the people whose movies you watch, before seeing them, but many others do. It's easy, especially on T.V., all you have to do is push a button and it'll tell you, on your screen the year it was made, who is in it, and who directed it. See...easy! :-)

And please don't flatter yourself, re Woody.

For starters, Dylan was 7 at the time of the supposed incident, he NEVER had done anything like he was accused of, before, nor afterwards. And judging from his past marriages and dating history/relationship history, you aren't his "type"; not many people are.

80 posted on 12/11/2017 3:49:42 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: Yaelle
Here's your post, wherein you do NOT know the title of the movie you saw on T.V.!

One of your LIES down, one to go.

91 posted on 12/11/2017 5:27:22 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson