Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: humblegunner
That doesn’t answer why no names are given.

I am assuming that he (and other accusers) are scared to death to name, names. We are talking about powerful men at the top of their profession who will protect themselves in any way possible.

23 posted on 10/30/2017 1:10:29 PM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: LibertarianLiz

He doesn’t have the money to defend himself


27 posted on 10/30/2017 1:17:48 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: LibertarianLiz; humblegunner

He has stated before that if he names people they can sue him for everything he has according to California law and the crimes against him are no longer punishable due to how long ago they happened.


29 posted on 10/30/2017 1:20:14 PM PDT by PMAS (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: LibertarianLiz

Naming names will get you in all kinds of trouble without solid proof. Even with solid proof, the very powerful can pay their way out of scrapes and sue the pants off their accusers.


59 posted on 10/30/2017 3:20:56 PM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson