Posted on 10/21/2017 6:53:35 AM PDT by Enlightened1
Oh yes, indeed!
Yep, that’s how they role.
>>Subject to the receipt of further information,<<
Never seen Trump hedge like this. What’s up with that?
Big smile on my face.....
“makes quite a convincing case that the really fatal head wound was from a shot fired accidentally by a secret service agent in the car behind.”
—
Sorry, but that claim makes me giggle, it makes no sense at all.
At any rate, the docs will likely be so redacted that I don’t expect much light to come from them.
“millions of pages released with everything blacked out except the pronouns ?”
—
Not even that - one “him, her, he or she” would trigger the “trans community”.
The only thing that MIGHT suggest the information might hurt the agency is if it turns out they were involved in a cover up (even that I’m willing to forgive knowing the circumstances of the Cuban Missile Crisis just being a recent memory). I’m extremely doubtful they were involved in JFK’s assassination.
If anything, if we’re to go by Humberto Fontova and Ion Mihai Pacepa, it was the Cubans/USSR that were involved, specifically the pro-Castro Cubans. Funny how people completely ignore the overwhelming evidence that the USSR and Cuba was involved in LHO’s actions (like, I don’t know, his getting passports from the Cuban and Russian embassies, his historic diary, some KGB codenames he had in mind, and also, last, but not least, the disinformation campaign Operation Dragon pertaining directly to the JFK assassination).
If there was no cover up, then why hold back the information for 53 years?
I’m sorry but I looked into this issue deeply. Meaning I listened to all sides. I went directly to the sources and not through 3rd party service. I examined the evidence and then applied critical thinking.
There are so many anomalies with this assignation, where standard protocol was not followed, that it reeks of a conspiracy. Moreover, if Cuba or Russia been involved then there would have been a war.
The Warren Commission is complete joke and was only more of a cover up. Probably to avoid a possible Civil War? Think about it. It was 1974 after the JFK assassination, Vietnam and then Nixon getting removed from office. 1974 was not a good year.
“If there was no cover up, then why hold back the information for 53 years?”
I never said there wasn’t a cover up, I said the CIA wasn’t the ones who assassinated JFK. Big difference.
And for the record, you ARE aware that we were not only in the middle of the Cold War, but less than a year before, we had come close to engaging in nuclear war with the Cuban Missile Crisis, right? Of course they’d cover it up for most of the Cold War, because if they found out the USSR was responsible, as you said, there’d be a nuclear war.
“There are so many anomalies with this assignation, where standard protocol was not followed, that it reeks of a conspiracy. Moreover, if Cuba or Russia been involved then there would have been a war.”
Yeah, and you have to admit, it’s very suspicious that the USSR would conduct a large-scale disinformation campaign specifically tailored to the JFK assassination that pinned the blame on CIA agents, LBJ, heck, right-wingers as a whole, especially if they weren’t involved. And besides, why on earth would LHO try to leave the country for Cuba and Russia, even stopping by the respective embassies to get the visas needed? Have you ever thought about that? Why would the Soviets care about creating a disinformation campaign pinning JFK’s assassination on right-wing elements, CIA agents, and even LBJ himself if they weren’t the ones who conducted the hit, directly or indirectly? If I were the USSR and I weren’t involved, I’d see zero reason to do a disinformation campaign precisely because, since we weren’t involved, there’s nothing really in it for us to do it.
Just saw your good question.
Answer: For years the cardiac risk factors have been smoking, diabetes, hypertension, family history of heart disease, elevated cholesterol and cocaine/methamphetamines. Out of the blue, “obesity” jumps past all the previous risk factors to be the #1 cause of heart disease - when it wasn’t even on the list until now . I did not see that coming. Still digesting it.
What is your view?
How so?
If not, look it up and understand that to which I refer, otherwise, I’m wasting my time discussing here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.