Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: VRWCarea51

What you mean she played his game?
If you mean screwed him for roles you have lost your mind.
She never needed him for roles.

Streep had already been nominated for two academy awards and the winner of one (Kramer vs Kramer) best actress, when Weinstein was still a nobody in Hollywood.
Miramax did not get its power until mid/late 80s after Streep was well into her iconic status as an actress and Hollywood royalty.

She’s a few years older than him and probably didn’t have anything to do with him outside of work, where he most likely treated her with respect vs the young hot actresses or employees that were trying to scrap for roles or a foothold in the business. Noway Weinstein is showing any kind of bad behavior with or around Streep.

Sexual harassers go after women in positions that are below them and wield power to bribe them into sexual favors to get or keep a job/career.

Can’t stand Streep’s politics but I get why she would not have known or seen any of Weinstein’s bad illegal behavior toward women.


89 posted on 10/09/2017 1:29:13 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: snarkytart

Anna Nicole married for Love and
Bill Clinton was just “Counseling” a confused kid...

Bwahahaha

She knew, she’s speaking now to cover her political ass!
You don’t spend as much time around someone like that and not know. She did what was best for her career. She is only speaking out because people have demanded comments from the Fruit Loops that ran in Weinstein’s circle.


90 posted on 10/10/2017 9:17:37 AM PDT by VRWCarea51 (The Original 1998 Version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson