If you had a 'deathly' allergy to something that you might encounter in normal daily living you probably would.
At least it wasn’t the dreaded peanut allergy — where one passenger prevents everyone on the flight from getting their free Southwest peanuts.
I can imagine needing a medical certificate stating that I had an allergy and could perhaps ‘not fly in the presence of dogs’ , but not one saying I could ‘fly safely.’ Similarly someone may be allergic to peanuts but I wouldn’t expect anyone to carry a certificate stating they could safely be in the presence of peanuts (peanut factories excepted.???)
>
I didn’t know I needed one. Nobody ever asked me for such a thing.
If you had a ‘deathly’ allergy to something that you might encounter in normal daily living you probably would.
>
One would expect to fly with HUMANS, nobody’s flying on the canine skyways.
I too am highly allergic to some animals (certain breeds of dogs more than others, cats), so I’m expected to keep some ‘cert’ handy for any/all flights in CASE someone decides to bring their beloved pet/service animal??
I might NOT die, but there’s no telling the level of reaction. And if a reaction DOES occur or even exacerbated (confined, recirculated allergens...or do they UV light in the system)?