Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Star Wars' Doubles Down on the Worst Tactical Vehicle In a Galaxy Far, Far Away
Popular Mechanics ^ | August 28, 2017 | Joe Pappalardo

Posted on 08/28/2017 1:55:06 PM PDT by C19fan

For snarky defense wonks like me, a new Star Wars movie means one thing: new military hardware to lambast. George Lucas' original sci-fi trilogy may have inspired a billion-dollar franchise, but it is a series that willfully abandons common military tactics, simple physics, and even common sense in the effort to create a cool new toy. To be fair: Star Wars tech is cool, and the original stop motion AT-ATs were a cinematic masterpiece. But after a moment of reflection, you realize they make idiotic military weapons.

(Excerpt) Read more at popularmechanics.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: star; wars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: DakotaGator
The Star Wars franchise has jumped the shark.

I kind of think it jumped the shark with episode 1, and it's done nothing but go downhill (like, freefall downhill), ever since. Actually, it started in Return of the Jedi with the freaking ewoks.

21 posted on 08/28/2017 2:29:34 PM PDT by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

The Empire never figured out nuclear weapons. Not so advanced after all. One tactical nuke = goodbye Hoth defenders.

But the worst thing about the JJ Abrams SW reboot is similar to the StarTrek reboot. The new master Jedi chick doesn’t bother with actually training to be a Jedi. Oh no. She just naturally can defeat others who have years of experience and training with laser swords. Just like that. Of course the movies are aimed at millenials who seem to have short attention spans and things like plot development and slow building suspense are beyond their ability to tolerate.


22 posted on 08/28/2017 2:30:16 PM PDT by Seruzawa (FABOL - F*** A Bunch Of Liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Star Wars Episode 4 - The Empire builds a Death Star at enormous expense and it is destroyed due to design flaw

Star Wars Episode 6 - The Empire builds a Death Star at enormous expense and it is destroyed due to design flaw

Conclusion. The Empire has a really powerful defense contractor’s lobby.


23 posted on 08/28/2017 2:31:41 PM PDT by Flick Lives (#CNNblackmail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Ah, Popular Mechanix, that authority on all things military.

They the ones with constant breathless articles of all the particle beam and such weapons about to be deployed, real soon now?

24 posted on 08/28/2017 2:32:34 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
For example, human interfaced fire control systems to target other craft in space. It is utter crap nonsense. Machines are far superior at this sort of thing.

This has always been a pet peeve. The Iron Man suit had a multiple targeting system. Combined with AI, a soldier from the future could identify and target all enemies in an area.

But of course, not as much fun.

25 posted on 08/28/2017 2:33:19 PM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is EVIL and needs to be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Star Wars completely ripped off the Dreadnaught design from an old Activision video game for the Mattel Intellivision in 1983 or so. The game was called THE DREADNAUGHT FACTOR.

Note that the ship is so large you can only see a portion on the screen at a time, and the appearance is limited by its early '80s home video game console graphics, but it is BIG, flat, and triangular.


26 posted on 08/28/2017 2:33:51 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

Could they please take out the “It’s A Small World” ride?


27 posted on 08/28/2017 2:34:02 PM PDT by Seruzawa (FABOL - F*** A Bunch Of Liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
it is a series that willfully abandons common military tactics, simple physics, and even common sense in the effort to create a cool new toy.

And that's really what it's all about.

28 posted on 08/28/2017 2:34:46 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Did Barack Obama denounce Communism and dictatorships when he visited Cuba as a puppet of the State?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7

What would be even scarier is if Boston Dynamics gave it razor sharp mantis claws and glowing, multi-faceted eyes.


29 posted on 08/28/2017 2:35:55 PM PDT by WMarshal (President Trump, a president keeping his promises to the American people. It feels like winning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

Little-known (or made-up) fact: The Ewoks weren’t the first choice. It was originally going to be Cabbage Patch kids but they wanted too large of a royalty share.


30 posted on 08/28/2017 2:36:38 PM PDT by philled (If this creature is not stopped it could make its way to Novosibirsk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive
But of course, not as much fun.

Yeah, reality tends to take the fun out of make believe.

31 posted on 08/28/2017 2:42:19 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NohSpinZone

But that Schwerer Gustav was just a bloody big cannon.

Its not an AFV, its a siege gun. It was meant to hang out far out of range and lob shells against concrete defenses.

They wanted a big cannon and the easiest way to train the thing was a section of curved railway.

A pretty good, cheap, reliable way to avoid giving the huge thing an equally huge traverse mechanism.

Now, you can argue that giant cannon like that were obsolete with the coming of aircraft, and you would be right, and something of that size simply wasn’t cost-effective anyway, even if you had something to besiege that was so well fortified as to need the attentions of a gun of this size, and you would be right also.


32 posted on 08/28/2017 2:44:11 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

That is exactly what they did!


33 posted on 08/28/2017 2:44:38 PM PDT by packrat35 (Pelosi is only on loan to the world from Satan. Hopefully he will soon want his baby killer back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

Conclusion #2: Super-weapons are a mirage. There’s alway a cheap counter-weapon that your enemy can flood-the-zone with.


34 posted on 08/28/2017 2:47:37 PM PDT by Tallguy (Twitter short-circuits common sense. Please engage your brain before tweeting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

There are two classes of people who really like it.

Kids,

and Grandparents who spend more time watching the kids’ reactions than the spectacle itself.

Of course, they could get rid of the gun-toting goons herding you into the line, instead of just letting you walk past to enjoy something you like.


35 posted on 08/28/2017 2:48:59 PM PDT by ExGeeEye (For dark is the suede that mows like a harvest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I don’t think the AT-ATs were the primary troop transport. They only carry 40 apiece. In general the imperial strategy with AT-ATs to use them as forcefield busters that also have troops while more troops come from a different direction. They’re very good at drawing a lot of attention which automatically makes other troops stealthy.


36 posted on 08/28/2017 2:49:07 PM PDT by discostu (Things are in their place, The heavens are secure, The whole thing explodes in my face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

Well the SW dreadnaught design is just the Star Destroyer design but bigger. So it really goes back to ‘77. The Big Flat Triangle is the second thing we see in the first movie.


37 posted on 08/28/2017 2:52:32 PM PDT by discostu (Things are in their place, The heavens are secure, The whole thing explodes in my face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Conan the Librarian
The ones in Rouge One were actually under-armed transports.


38 posted on 08/28/2017 2:54:52 PM PDT by Disambiguator (Keepin' it analog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

Uh...Star Was came out many years before that video game...


39 posted on 08/28/2017 2:56:30 PM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
Star Wars completely ripped off the Dreadnaught design from an old Activision video game for the Mattel Intellivision in 1983 or so.

Except that the first three Star Wars movies were released in 1977, 1980, and 1983. How did they rip off something that came later?

40 posted on 08/28/2017 3:03:54 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson