I don’t know why the teachers cross that line that should not be crossed. I don’t believe it’s ok for women to abuse young people who cannot make such decisions. I understand for male FReepers they are thinking that for the boy it’s merely a lovely moment that is more fun than masturbating. But it is abuse, taking someone’s will away by seduction.
Adults should not seduce children. We’ve drawn that line at 18, because you have to draw a line somewhere. Anyone who INSISTS on having sex with someone under that line (and there is a grey area with two peers, teen friends who are 17 and 18) IS A BAD PERSON.
This woman is a bad person. She can have sex with ANYONE over 18 if she wants sex. She chose to disobey. How much you “love” them doesn’t matter. Woody Allen claimed to his 5 year old that it was because he loved her that much.
Maybe it harms the boy, maybe it doesn’t. Too much of it harms him. Being a long term pet of an older powerful woman and used for sex (often plied with substances) harms boys. I know some who really had ruined lives after such abuse.
Wow, that was hilarious! I had my laugh of the day! Thanks.
The worst part of me is that it’s a teacher who has some sway and potentially is very influential because of status, over a student. Like Clinton and his intern. in sexual harassment it is assumed the manager has force and say over the lower level employee because they their need to be secure in their job. Same with teachers.