Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Banning Transgender Troops Could Cost U.S.$960 Million, Report Says
NBC News ^ | August 15, 2017 | by MEDARDO PEREZ

Posted on 08/15/2017 12:03:03 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

A new report estimates banning transgender service members would set the U.S. back $960 million, challenging President Donald Trump's pro-ban argument about "the tremendous medical costs" associated with permitting transgender people to serve in the military.

The report, co-authored by the Palm Center and current and retired professors at the Naval Postgraduate School, estimates the cost to replace transgender service members would be 100 times greater than current estimates for the annual cost of providing them transition-related care.

"President Trump said that he wants to fire honorably serving transgender troops in order to save money, but that begs the question, 'How much money would it cost to implement the President's vision?'" Palm Center Executive Director Aaron Belkin said.

"It would be much more expensive to fire transgender troops then to let them keep serving. The President wants to spend $1 dollar to save a dime, and that really doesn't make much business sense."


TOPICS: Cheese, Moose, Sister
KEYWORDS: culturalmarxism; fakemedia; fakenews; homosexualagenda; military; militaryreadiness; militaryspending; propaganda; transgender; troops; trump; trumpdod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: TBP

Where does the media find these ridiculous studies?


I have no doubt these Soros funded organizations crank out these BS studies. They likely have zero credibility, but it does not matter. The MSM will latch on to them to justify their bias.


61 posted on 08/15/2017 12:53:06 PM PDT by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Only $900M? Money well spent.


62 posted on 08/15/2017 1:01:24 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

By that argument, it is more expensive to train new soldiers for those killed in combat or severely wounded, therefore we should not send our soldiers into combat.


63 posted on 08/15/2017 1:03:31 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Besides which, think how many MAGA types discouraged their kids from joining the military in the era of 0bama and his neutering of the military. Who would want to enlist, knowing he was the CIC, and you might be sleeping next to a gay or transgender person in your tent in the desert?

I think this change will bring an uptick in enlistments of patriotic young people.


64 posted on 08/15/2017 1:08:41 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Amazing. The Left always suddenly cares about cost when it’s one of their pet projects.

Don’t worry snowflakes Illegals are being sent packing a few at a time just like they came in, and the trans-whatever will be separated from active duty similarly.


65 posted on 08/15/2017 1:12:07 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Your post says it all. A gay man founded the company that posted this report? Yeah right! Go away quickly.


66 posted on 08/15/2017 1:17:00 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Your post says it all. A gay man founded the company that posted this report? Yeah right! Go away quickly.


67 posted on 08/15/2017 1:18:10 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Ah yes. A completely unbiased report on what “could” happen from the completely unbiased Rosey Palm Center for Unbiased Reporting and Non-advocacy of Homosexual Issues.


68 posted on 08/15/2017 1:21:09 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Your post says it all. A gay man founded the company that posted this report? Yeah right! Go away quickly.


69 posted on 08/15/2017 1:25:48 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It’s sad how many people will actually believe this nonsense.


70 posted on 08/15/2017 1:26:45 PM PDT by Antoninus ("The Western world has lost its civil courage, both as a whole and separately." -Solzhenitsyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

They only want in the military to GET FREE STUFF!


71 posted on 08/15/2017 1:29:29 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda�Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

I bet it would cost more to GIVE THEM FREE CHANGES, PAY THEM WHILE THE RECUPE.....AND who knows what other expenses.


72 posted on 08/15/2017 1:31:18 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda�Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Better than costing a war.


73 posted on 08/15/2017 1:32:08 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Banning Transgender Troops Could Cost U.S.$960 Million, Report Says”

Pretty good investment to purge the perverts and deviants from the military. (we all know that the above headline is fake news).


74 posted on 08/15/2017 1:33:20 PM PDT by kenmcg (tHE WHOLE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I can’t believe it only costs $20,000 for an addadicktome (unbelievablely, that word came up to add!). Is that the total price for the surgery?


75 posted on 08/15/2017 1:38:40 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne; Oldeconomybuyer
Ban them anyway. And we also need to go back to pre-Clinton era Ask-Tell as well.

Unless I am mistaken ‘Don’t ask, don’t tell was an Executive Order and can be easily changed by the President.

Well easy in an administrative way.

However it would set off a political fire storm.

But as a practical matter and the fiscally responsible thing to do is to reinstate the requirement to state under penalty of perjury that an enlistee is not a homosexual and not a transgender in waiting.

The military is not designed to be nor can it function as a purely medical plan for these mentally ill people.

76 posted on 08/15/2017 1:41:11 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.L)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Two words: FAKE NEWS!


77 posted on 08/15/2017 1:52:23 PM PDT by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I’m no expert on the topic. But what happened to “Don’t ask. Don’t tell?” as a fallback position?

Not all transgenders, or gays, or straights are attention getting, lawsuit obsessed money chasers. Two of the three gays in my unit in Vietnam were good soldiers. One wasn’t.

Is it possible to treat people as individuals and not as stereotypes of labels created by the identity group manufacturing industry?


78 posted on 08/15/2017 1:53:18 PM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

That same sort of cost-benefit analysis applied to Trump’s Wall would net the treasury $999 trillion.


79 posted on 08/15/2017 2:03:58 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Pure bull sh-t.


80 posted on 08/15/2017 2:09:37 PM PDT by mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson