Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hubble Finds a Dead Galaxy that was Finished Making Stars Just a Billion Years After the Big Bang
universetoday.com ^ | Published: 22 Jun , 2017 | Matt Williams

Posted on 06/22/2017 8:43:14 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Thanks to recent improvements in space-based and ground-based telescopes, astronomers have been able to probe deeper into the Universe than ever before. By looking billions of years back in time, we are able to test our theories about the history of galactic formation and evolution. Unfortunately, studying the very early Universe is a daunting task, and one that is beyond the capabilities of our current instruments.

But by combining the power of the Hubble Space Telescope with a technique known as gravitational lensing, a team of astronomers made the first discovery of a compact galaxy that stopped making stars just a few billion years after the Big Bang. The discovery of such a galaxy existing so early in the Universe is unprecedented and represents a major challenge to \theories of how massive galaxies form and evolve.

Their findings were reported in a study titled “A Massive, Dead Disk Galaxy in the Early Universe“, which appeared in the June 22 issue of the journal Nature. As is indicated in the study, the team relied on data from Hubble which they combined with gravitational lensing – where a massive cluster of galaxies magnifies and stretches images of more distant galaxies beyond them – to study the distant galaxy known as MACS 2129-1.

Image of the Galaxy Cluster MACS J2129-0741, as part of CLASH. Credit: hubblesite.org

What they found was completely unexpected. Given the age of the galaxy – dated to just three billion years after the Big Bang – they expected to see a chaotic ball of stars that were forming due to early galaxies merging. Instead, they noticed that the galaxy, which was disk-shaped (like the Milky Way), was effectively dead – meaning that star formation had already ceased within it.

This was a surprise, seeing as how astronomers did not expect to see this so early in the Universe. What’s more, it was the first time that direct evidence has been obtained that shows how at least some of the earliest “dead” galaxies in the Universe evolved from disk-shaped objects to become the giant elliptical galaxies that we regularly see in the Universe today.

As Sune Toft – a researcher from the Dark Cosmology Center at the Niels Bohr Institute and the lead author on the study – explained, this may force a rethink of how galaxies evolved in the early Universe:

“This new insight may force us to rethink the whole cosmological context of how galaxies burn out early on and evolve into local elliptical-shaped galaxies, Perhaps we have been blind to the fact that early “dead” galaxies could in fact be disks, simply because we haven’t been able to resolve them.”

In previous studies, it was assumed that distant dead galaxies were similar in structure to the local elliptical galaxies they eventually evolved into. Prior to this study, confirmation of this hypothesis was not possible since current instruments are not powerful enough to see that far into space. But by combining the power of gravitational lensing with Hubble’s high resolution, Toft and his team were able to see this dead galaxy clearly.

Galaxy Cluster MACS J2129-0741 and Lensed Galaxy MACS2129- Credit: hubblesite.org

Combining rotational velocity measurements from the ESO’s Very Large Telescope (VLT) with archival data from the Cluster Lensing And Supernova survey with Hubble (CLASH), they were able to determine the size of the galaxy, mass, and age as well as its (defunct) rate of star formation. Ultimately, they found that the remote galaxy is three times as massive as the Milky Way, though only half its size, and is spinning more than twice as fast.

Why this galaxy stopped forming stars is still unknown, and will require follow-up surveys using more sophisticated instruments. But in the meantime, there are some possible theories. For instance, it could be the result of an active galactic nucleus, where a supermassive black hole at the center of MACS 2129-1 inhibited star formation by heating the galaxy’s gas and expelling it from the galaxy.

Or it may be the result of cold gas being streamed into the galaxy’s center where it was rapidly heated and compressed, thereby preventing it from cooling and forming star-forming clouds. But when it comes to how these types of early, dead galaxies could have led to the elliptical galaxies we see today, Toft and his colleagues think they know the answer. As he explained, it could be through mergers:

“If these galaxies grow through merging with minor companions, and these minor companions come in large numbers and from all sorts of different angles onto the galaxy, this would eventually randomize the orbits of stars in the galaxies. You could also imagine major mergers. This would definitely also destroy the ordered motion of the stars.”

In the coming years, Toft and his team hope to take advantage of the James Webb Telescope (which will be launching in 2018) to search for more early dead galaxies, in the hopes that it can shed light on the unresolved questions this discover raises. And with the ability to probe deeper into space, astronomers anticipate that a great deal more will be revealed about the early Universe.

Further Reading: Hubblesite, Nature



TOPICS: Astronomy
KEYWORDS: hubble
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 06/22/2017 8:43:15 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Guess I won’t lose excessive sleep over this one


2 posted on 06/22/2017 8:45:39 PM PDT by DollyCali (Don't tell God how big your storm is..... Tell the storm how BIG your God is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It’s dead, Jim.


3 posted on 06/22/2017 8:45:53 PM PDT by Redcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This new insight may force us to rethink the whole cosmological context of how galaxies burn out early on and evolve...

Balderdash!! 97% of astronomers say the science of galaxies is settled.

4 posted on 06/22/2017 8:54:25 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Universal warming is a real and present danger.


5 posted on 06/22/2017 8:56:56 PM PDT by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Interesting.


6 posted on 06/22/2017 9:02:47 PM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; SunkenCiv; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; TigersEye; Oynx; Marine_Uncle; BenLurkin; ...
********************************************************

they were able to determine the size of the galaxy, mass, and age as well as its (defunct) rate of star formation. Ultimately, they found that the remote galaxy is three times as massive as the Milky Way, though only half its size, and is spinning more than twice as fast.

**********************************************

How can it be doing that and not forming new stars....?

I need a clue.

7 posted on 06/22/2017 9:18:56 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Hogwash. Hogwash, and hogwash again. This is nothing more than assumption upon assumption upon assumption. You cannot prove this without assumptions that cannot be experimentally proven. Hogwash.


8 posted on 06/22/2017 9:21:18 PM PDT by Fungi (Mucor roxii is not a rock band.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

In previous studies, it was assumed that distant dead galaxies were similar in structure to the local elliptical galaxies they eventually evolved into.

...

So the news or surprise is that this “dead” galaxy is a disk rather than an elliptical.


9 posted on 06/22/2017 9:43:30 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

From Wiki:

Star formation

The traditional portrait[citation needed] of elliptical galaxies paints them as galaxies where star formation finished after an initial burst at high-redshift, leaving them to shine with only their aging stars. Elliptical galaxies typically appear yellow-red, which is in contrast to the distinct blue tinge of most spiral galaxies. In spirals, this blue color emanates largely from the young, hot stars in their spiral arms. Very little star formation is thought to occur in elliptical galaxies, because of their lack of gas compared to spiral or irregular galaxies. However, in recent years, evidence has shown that a reasonable proportion (~25%) of these galaxies have residual gas reservoirs[6] and low level star-formation.[7] Researchers with the Herschel Space Observatory have speculated that the central black holes in elliptical galaxies keep the gas from cooling enough for star formation.[8]


10 posted on 06/22/2017 9:54:02 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TBP

A scary thought is if there was ever life in civilizations in this galaxy, they are now long gone.


11 posted on 06/22/2017 10:02:30 PM PDT by MNDude (God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democratt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Another new discovery, another thing that doesn’t and can’t fit inside the Standard Model.

I can no longer take seriously anyone who continues to take the model seriously. It’s nothing more than a stand-in for institutional corruption, inertia, and fraud.


12 posted on 06/22/2017 10:12:03 PM PDT by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Yet, Hubble can’t give us photos of the flag or Apollo lunar landers left on the moon...

...sigh.


13 posted on 06/23/2017 12:39:31 AM PDT by Sontagged (Lord Jesus: please expose, unveil and then frogmarch Your enemies behind You as You've promised...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

LOL!


14 posted on 06/23/2017 4:04:55 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
it could be the result of an active galactic nucleus, where a supermassive black hole at the center of MACS 2129-1 inhibited star formation by heating the galaxy’s gas and expelling it from the galaxy.

I hate it when that happens.

15 posted on 06/23/2017 4:16:18 AM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Methinks this story is lot of hypothetical assunptions


16 posted on 06/23/2017 4:24:25 AM PDT by okie 54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Very little star formation is thought to occur in elliptical galaxies, because of their lack of gas compared to spiral or irregular galaxies.

So in essence you can say... They ran out of gas.

17 posted on 06/23/2017 5:12:24 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Keep fighting the Left and their Fake News!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Hubble scientists zoomed in on the dead galaxy to try to determine the cause of its death...


18 posted on 06/23/2017 5:19:00 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (RuPaul and Yertle - our illustrious Republican leaders up the Hill - God help us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fungi
Hogwash. Hogwash, and hogwash again. This is nothing more than assumption upon assumption upon assumption. You cannot prove this without assumptions that cannot be experimentally proven. Hogwash.

You seem to be one of those doubters that believe that the universe is flat.

19 posted on 06/23/2017 8:41:04 AM PDT by Know et al ( Keep on Freepin'!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet
it could be the result of an active galactic nucleus, where a supermassive black hole at the center of MACS 2129-1 inhibited star formation by heating the galaxy’s gas and expelling it from the galaxy.

That's what I was thinking.

20 posted on 06/23/2017 8:43:57 AM PDT by Know et al ( Keep on Freepin'!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson