Posted on 05/25/2017 12:37:54 PM PDT by SeanG200
Hands As Sexy As Breast ~ Per Feminists (https://youtu.be/N_V2rxfxIeU) ||| Yesterday's show and today's column by Dennis Prager deals with CNN reporter, Jill Filipovic, writing about Australian Sen. Larissa Waters. Sen. Waters does not cover her breast while the baby eats... a polite manner/habit when breastfeeding in public. The part I was especially interested in was the portion quoting evolutionary psychologist Carol Jahme, a science columnist for the left-wing pro-feminist publication the Guardian....
➤ "The full, plump bosom seen in the human ape is an anomaly. No other primate has a permanent breast. ... The sex appeal of rounded female buttocks and plump breasts is both universal and unique to the human primate." So, then, the sole purpose of women's breasts is not for nursing babies. It is also to attract and arouse men. Yet, whoever argues that women's breasts are there to arouse men, not just to provide a baby with milk, is dismissed by feminists as a sexist heterosexist patriarchal pig, a product of a sexist culture that renders women and their baby-feeding mammary glands sexual objects. (http://tinyurl.com/kzfng7s)
Keep in mind, I do not believe in naturalistic evolution, but this is an argument you would adopt to show the detractor that even their side argues against them.
Gaaahhh!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.