Posted on 05/23/2017 2:15:30 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
It was a bit of a nothingburger. Just more assertions from Kimdotcom that he “had evidence” but not actually releasing any.
Agreed. The Victim’s family reminds me of when OJ said he was going to dedicate himself to finding the REAL killer and then dedicated himself to hookers and blow in Vegas.
“Podesta et al sicced the full weight of the IC on them (and probably every person that worked at the DNC, “just to be sure”) and found out about what Rich was doing.
Then Podesta says his famous leaker comment:
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/36082#efmAGSAH-";
Do you even bother to read your own links? The Podesta email is from a year BEFORE the DNC leak. Might want to work on your timeline a little bit more.
“Yep. Always follow the money.” It does make you wonder. It appears one family member, Jonathan Rich, wants to talk about Seth.
Because the truth will prove that President Trump did NOT collude with Russia..it will destroy the Democrats narrative, and it will show that the Democrats had more to gain from Seth Rich being murdered..the focus would turn to the Dem party something they dont want to see happen
Yes, he did, in an email chain where the consequences talked about were rescinding job offers to potential hires who were found to be leaking to the media. Sounds a lot more menacing when quoted out of context.
“Immaterial.”
Well, it’s pretty material that Podesta couldn’t possibly have been talking about “the leaker”, as you asserted.
“Podesta himself gives a plausible motive for killing leakers and taking that risk.”
Except the email chain wasn’t talking about killing anyone, it was talking about rescinding job offers to potential hires that were found to be leaking, and telling other potential hires that those would the consequences. Podesta wasn’t even the one proposing it, he just agreed with the recommendation.
“Would no one rid me of this troublesome priest?!!”
Have they been seen driving a brand new Tesla perhaps?
You missing the point. The author of this article said he could not fathom any reason why someone would kill a leaker due to the risk. Could have pointed out in my own words, well you make an example of the leaker. But why use my words when I can quote Podesta ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.