Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Drink your Ovaltine. Or the truth?
1 posted on 05/23/2017 8:50:15 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: epluribus_2

Kim DotCom is going to get killed sometime soon if he’s not careful.


2 posted on 05/23/2017 8:51:47 AM PDT by MeganC (Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: epluribus_2

If I were him, I would be applying for asylum in an Ecuadorian embassy somewhere.


3 posted on 05/23/2017 8:52:58 AM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: epluribus_2

Has he ever lied to us?...................


4 posted on 05/23/2017 8:54:01 AM PDT by Red Badger (Profanity is the sound of an ignorant mind trying to express itself.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: epluribus_2

Ask Dorothy Kilgallen how well it works to announce you will be releasing damning evidence “soon”.


5 posted on 05/23/2017 8:55:03 AM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Charlie, here comes the deuce, and when you speak of me speak well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: epluribus_2

My bet would be its a nothing-burger.


8 posted on 05/23/2017 8:58:06 AM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: epluribus_2

This guy is the biggest showman since PT Barnum. And we seem to fall for it every time.


11 posted on 05/23/2017 8:59:51 AM PDT by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: epluribus_2

the longer he waits the less likely it is that he will live to do it.


15 posted on 05/23/2017 9:00:58 AM PDT by The_Republic_Of_Maine (politicians beware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: epluribus_2

I predict “Drink your Ovaltine” grade information.


16 posted on 05/23/2017 9:02:19 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: epluribus_2

How many business hours?


17 posted on 05/23/2017 9:05:04 AM PDT by JohnnyP (Thinking is hard work (I stole that from Rush).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: epluribus_2
warnings of coming evidence of crimes to be released that will affect the Clintons, the DNC and the Dc establishment invariably never result in any legal consequences. Most of the time those who possess said damning information / evidence end up dead. Now who would one suppose had them killed?
22 posted on 05/23/2017 9:14:09 AM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: epluribus_2

What is the value in announcing a release rather than just releasing?


23 posted on 05/23/2017 9:14:28 AM PDT by posterchild (Treade a worme on the tayle, and it must turne agayne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: epluribus_2

Bkmrk.


26 posted on 05/23/2017 9:16:35 AM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: epluribus_2

Drink your Ovaltine is my bet.


27 posted on 05/23/2017 9:16:38 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: epluribus_2

He’s going to end up with the DOJ, CIA, DNC and all their cohorts after him at the same time.

Not a good place to be.


29 posted on 05/23/2017 9:17:56 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: epluribus_2

Either release it or pound sand. The tease has lost its flair.


33 posted on 05/23/2017 9:21:17 AM PDT by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: epluribus_2

He’s nothing but talk.


34 posted on 05/23/2017 9:21:24 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: epluribus_2

Is his big announcement expected to be via Twitter, or Hannity radio, or Hannity TV?


41 posted on 05/23/2017 9:59:58 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: epluribus_2

If I were Sean I would want him to explain the evidence BEFORE he is allowed on air.


42 posted on 05/23/2017 10:04:38 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: epluribus_2

#SethRich was a hero
I know that Setch Rich was involved in the DNC leak.

I know this because in late 2014 a person contacted me about helping me to start a branch of the Internet Party in the United States. He called himself Panda. I now know that Panda was Seth Rich.

Panda advised me that he was working on voter analytics tools and other technologies that the Internet Party may find helpful.

I communicated with Panda on a number of topics including corruption and the influence of corporate money in politics.
“He wanted to change that from the inside.”

I was referring to what I knew when I did an interview with Bloomberg in New Zealand in May 2015. In that interview I hinted that Julian Assange and Wikileaks would release information about Hillary Clinton in the upcoming election.

The Rich family has reached out to me to ask that I be sensitive to their loss in my public comments. That request is entirely reasonable.

I have consulted with my lawyers. I accept that my full statement should be provided to the authorities and I am prepared to do that so that there can be a full investigation. My lawyers will speak with the authorities regarding the proper process.

If my evidence is required to be given in the United States I would be prepared to do so if appropriate arrangements are made. I would need a guarantee from Special Counsel Mueller, on behalf of the United States, of safe passage from New Zealand to the United States and back. In the coming days we will be communicating with the appropriate authorities to make the necessary arrangements. In the meantime, I will make no further comment.
Statement from
Kim Dotco


44 posted on 05/23/2017 10:10:11 AM PDT by Red Badger (Profanity is the sound of an ignorant mind trying to express itself.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: epluribus_2
FR thread containing text of Kim Dotcom release

I KNOW THAT SETH RICH WAS INVOLVED IN THE DNC LEAK. I know this because in late 2014 a person contacted me about helping me to start a branch of the Internet Party in the United States. He called himself Panda.

I now know that Panda was Seth Rich. Panda advised me that he was working on voter analytics tools and other technologies that the Internet Party may find helpful. I communicated with Panda on a number of topics including corruption and the influence of corporate money in politics.

"He wanted to change that from the inside." I was referring to what I knew when I did an interview with Bloomberg in New Zealand in May 2015. In that interview I hinted that Julian Assange and Wikileaks would release information about Hillary Clinton in the upcoming election.

The Rich family has reached out to me to ask that I be sensitive to their loss in my public comments. That request is entirely reasonable. I have consulted with my lawyers. I accept that my full statement should be provided to the authorities and I am prepared to do that so that there can be a full investigation.

My lawyers will speak with the authorities regarding the proper process. If my evidence is required to be given in the United States I would be prepared to do so if appropriate arrangements are made. I would need a guarantee from Special Counsel Mueller, on behalf of the United States, of safe passage from New Zealand to the United States and back. In the coming days we will be communicating with the appropriate authorities to make the necessary arrangements. In the meantime, I will make no further comment.


48 posted on 05/23/2017 10:42:31 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson