Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625

“Equating liking young-but-legally-adult women with “pedophilia” does not help your case.”

But you do.

A child is in their parent’s care until the age of 18. If you find a 14 year old attractive, you find a child attractive for sex.

I drove this point home during the Milo bullsh!ttery a month ago. It seems that his argument freed a lot of pedos to be able to argue their case.

18 years old. Any younger, and they’re children. Period. If you think of children in a sexual manner, you’re a pedophile.

I hope you can see the logic here, and the logic behind the whole “pre adolescent” proto-argument. One is good, the other is evil.


62 posted on 05/23/2017 8:57:08 AM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Celerity
18 years old. Any younger, and they’re children. Period. If you think of children in a sexual manner, you’re a pedophile.

So you're telling me that I was a pedophile in high school, because I was sexually attracted by girls my own age?

But, getting back to the original topic: being attracted to women over the age of 18 is not pedophilia, even if the guy is much older than 18.

63 posted on 05/23/2017 9:21:19 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson