Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

"No, I'm not crazy"

1 posted on 05/02/2017 5:52:25 AM PDT by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: simpson96

Yes, you are batshit crazy but I do hope Ms. Clinton runs again so we can kick her butt even harder.


2 posted on 05/02/2017 5:53:44 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Mitt Romney “lost to a chair”


3 posted on 05/02/2017 5:55:24 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Clinton, running again? Oh please, oh please!

* Couldn’t beat Obama in the primary in 2008, despite him starting with little name recognition and everyone knowing her.
* Barely won against a kooky 75-year-old socialist who honeymooned in the Soviet Union and who’s not even a Democrat in the primary in 2016, then got soundly beaten by Trump, including losses in supposedly hardcore “democratic” states.

Bring it on!


5 posted on 05/02/2017 5:57:05 AM PDT by OldGuard1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

You CANNOT fix retarded.


8 posted on 05/02/2017 6:01:21 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96
I knew it would be delicious. I didn't know it would be this delicious.
Dennis Miller
11 posted on 05/02/2017 6:06:11 AM PDT by IWontSubmit (2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

How about Eliz Warren?

I still crack up when Trump calls her Pocahontas.


12 posted on 05/02/2017 6:06:12 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Trump "Mexico will pay for the Wall! Mark my words")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Needs professional help.


15 posted on 05/02/2017 6:12:03 AM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

These idiots still don’t get it.


16 posted on 05/02/2017 6:12:40 AM PDT by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

I’m almost done reading Shattered. That book has successfully killed any remaining hope she has.


19 posted on 05/02/2017 6:17:50 AM PDT by jalisco555 ("In a Time of Universal Deceit Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act" - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96
"Why on Earth would I want her to run again in 2020?"

Maybe this would be your idea of a new version of the "I Lucy" or "Carol Burnett" shows?

20 posted on 05/02/2017 6:23:29 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

The author has found new ways to use the F word. I’m impressed.


21 posted on 05/02/2017 6:28:06 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

27 posted on 05/02/2017 7:03:19 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation has ended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Fact Check: Chair is only 29 years old

30 posted on 05/02/2017 7:52:35 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96
Times change. Situations change. People change. Can Hillary? My money’s on yes.
I think it is inevitable that Hillary will change in the next four years. As much as anything, the fact that Hillary wasn’t even able to keep from fainting in public in ’16 affected her campaign.

Granted that Nixon lost in ’60 and later won, in 2020 Hillary won’t be 55 yo like Nixon was in ’68. She’ll be 74.

What won’t change is that she’ll still be the only major-party presidential candidate in history to have been under investigation for gross abuse of federal office while running for the presidency.

Speaking of which, instead of investigating whether Hillary was criminally negligent (DUH!) in her mishandling of classified info, DoJ should build a case for charging her with suppressing info to which the public was entitled under FOIA. That is a charge which the public should understand. Show that she was hiding the fact that she was on the take.


32 posted on 05/02/2017 10:59:58 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which ‘liberalism’ coheres is that NOTHING ACTUALLY MATTERS except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson