Hospitals/doctors should be under absolutely no obligation to mutilate a patient based on the patient’s psychopathic whims.
What the hell is the basis for a lawsuit? They referred him elsewhere and he got his female innards ripped out as he wanted. Why then does he have any basis to sue the hospital which wouldn’t perform the procedure?
This reminds me of the gay wedding cake stories, in which militant gays don’t accept the idea of being referred elsewhere. They want to force you to perform for them.