This hurts this publication more than helps. I am familiar with the story. The woman in this case was threatening bad publicity if the mother didn't force-sell to her for a good price, so, basically, we have Nazis versus a Jewish individual who was trying to extort someone. How's that help Gersh or this article's argument? Same thing with the claim about "rampant hate crimes" being committed against Jews. Most of the examples given have been proven to be hoaxes. This paper strategically did not mention the the hundreds of bomb threats that were previously being reported as the biggest Trump related anti-Jewish hate crime in years. The result was that a Jewish teenager--who happened to be running a multi-million dollar forged document ring from his basement with the help of his father--was outed by the FBI as being responsible for the calls.
What this writer basically wants is to invent a Neo-Nazi menace that does not exist in order to attack first amendment rights in the United States. Next thing you know, we'll be at the mercy of neurotic people like the Presidents of the ADL or the SPLC who insist that basically anyone who isn't left of Mao is an anti-semite.
Force-sell? Like a home or something?