Posted on 04/21/2017 3:50:02 PM PDT by heterosupremacist
"This is an increasingly common idea, and is not just restricted to failed presidential candidates. It is also an extremely insidious idea, for hate speech, contrary to popular belief, is not an objectively quantifiable entity.
Ones persons hate speech is anothers outspoken defense of liberty and justice. And there is no basis in the Constitution, or in the numerous Supreme Court decisions interpreting it up to now, for the claim that there is any exclusion of hate speech from First Amendment protection. The label of hate speech is a tool in the hands of the powerful that they use to stigmatize and silence the powerless.
Thats why Deans statement is so dangerous: it heralds the end of all First Amendment protection, and the criminalization of dissent..."
(Excerpt) Read more at jihadwatch.org ...
Hey Dino, put your big girl panties on dumb azz!
I assume this means Dean will shut up.
This what I call Shariah Socialism. Opposite side of the same evil coin.
Scratch a liberal and you’ll expose a fascist underneath.
Every time!
Then it would be illigal for democrats to talk.
From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. United States v. Butler, 1936.
Drain the swamp! Drain the swamp!
Remember in November 18 !
Since Trump entered the 16 presidential race too late for patriots to make sure that there were state sovereignty-respecting candidates on the primary ballots, patriots need make sure that such candidates are on the 18 primary ballots so that they can be elected to support Trump in draining the unconstitutionally big federal government swamp.
Such a Congress will also be able to finish draining the swamp with respect to getting the remaining state sovereignty-ignoring, activist Supreme Court justices off of the bench.
In fact, if Justice Gorsuch turns out to be a liberal Trojan Horse then we will need 67 patriot senators to remove a House-impeached Gorsuch from office.
Noting that the primaries start in Iowa and New Hampshire in February 18, patriots need to challenge candidates for federal office in the following way.
While I Googled the primary information above concerning Iowa and New Hampshire, FReeper iowamark brought to my attention that the February primaries for these states apply only to presidential election years. And after doing some more scratching, since primary dates for most states for 2018 elections probably havent been uploaded at this time (March 14, 2017), FReepers will need to find out primary dates from sources and / or websites in their own states.
Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitutions Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal governments powers.
For progressive loons, ONLY Conservatives are hateful..meanwhile liberals are the ones attacking people with rocks, knives, and everything else they can get their pathetic hands on
then every leftist in America should be locked up !
because they spew nothing but HATE for Trump!
“Hate speech is speech which attacks a person or group on the basis of attributes such as gender, ethnic origin, religion, race, disability, or sexual orientation.”
Well, Howard, my boy, that means I can call you a stupid, idiotic fool and not cross the line. So I’d be right in both cases.
red
There’s a reason you don’t ask a lawyer for a medical opinion. And visa versa.
I hate you Howard Dean.
” hate speech, is not an objectively quantifiable entity.”
Nor is it a universally accepted definition, which doesnt matter.
In any case, you argument fails on its own definition and because my rabbit has a pancake on its head
Wasnt even talking to you...
I think you just made fun of his disability there...
What is hate speech? Didn’t Ben Shapiro get run off from a speaking engagement by violent protesters because they said he is a spewer of hate speech. Seriously, Ben Shapiro spews hate?
Hate speech is whatever speech doesn’t agree with the accuser’s position And Howard Dean is a psycho gasbag who is a hazard to liberty. There — I probably went and committed hate speech.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.