Posted on 04/17/2017 10:59:54 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Same here -- gave up the same year.
It's not that the new languages are bad, it's that a lot of them weren't necessary. In 1998, I was hired to convert a suite of programs from VB5 to VB6 (?). In the process, we were to convert the functions into objects.
I set about learning what these newfangled "objects" were and completed the project. It was judged a huge success -- all the programs worked just as they had before except, of course, they were slower.
Heh. Time marches on. I didn't. No point.
FORTRAN was, is and always be the standard for computational programming, and here is a great FORTRAN-15 video that proves just that...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Gp5YJfinOA
Thanks, a nice video.
..and the slides are here as well http://insidehpc.com/2017/02/tutorial-towards-exascale-computing-fortran-2015/
NASA is holding a contest featuring a prize purse of up to $55,000. It’s the sort of app dev challenge that would look good on any résumé - if you know FORTRAN, that is. And computational fluid dynamics, too.
Static is you fiend.
Fixed.
i'd love to see some of the code though
In that case you can request a download of FUN3D here https://software.nasa.gov/software/LAR-18968-1
mark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.