Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan

US tank destroyers were equally poor.

Far better to have up-gunned the Sherman; and to have up-armored it. Far too many of men were lost in that medium tank because of Washington’s decisions.

Yes, it was better than nothing. Better than the early light tanks it replaced. But not much better.


3 posted on 04/17/2017 4:44:58 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE

The only thing the Sherman had going for it was the astounding numbers of them that were built and sent to the battlefield.

Germany simply could not match those numbers.


7 posted on 04/17/2017 5:21:45 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Ignorance is reparable, stupid is forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

The Army could not bring itself to adopt the 17 pounder for its Shermans and TD’s. That would have saved a lot of lives among tankers.


12 posted on 04/17/2017 5:40:05 AM PDT by yawningotter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

The hellcats seemed to be really good.

Btw, any one hear play world of tanks on Xbox?


23 posted on 04/17/2017 7:02:52 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (what a mess we got ourselves into)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson