>Unless you know this woman personally so you know details beyond what was in the story, you are making assumptions and passing it off as if it was fact, which is the definition of bearing false witness.
You read the article in an intentionally stupid way to avoid the obvious. She was not called a widow. Her title was single mother. Thus Morgana is quite correct about her status. Play liberal word games someplace more suitable for them like the DU and stop accusing people of falsehoods.
It said that the girl’s father was not in her life.
We know nothing beyond that. For all we know she could have divorced the dad after he had an affair, which is permissible according to Scripture. We just don’t know. That’s why Nifster said Morgana should give the details if she knew them. She wouldn’t. Do you know the details? If so, tell us. If not, admit that you have speculated and in so doing have spread gossip with an intent to damage this woman’s reputation.