Posted on 03/21/2017 5:46:56 PM PDT by Morgana
A top British medical leader is facing public backlash this week after saying women should be allowed to abort an unborn baby simply because of the baby’s sex.
In an interview with the Daily Mail, Professor Wendy Savage, a member of the British Medical Association ethics committee, argued that sex-selection abortions are not happening in Britain. A retired OB-GYN and abortion practitioner, Savage said she performed about 10,000 abortions during her career and only once was asked to abort an unborn child because of its sex.
But Savage’s claims about rarity basically are meaningless, given that she believes women should be allowed to abort an unborn child because of his or her sex – for any reason at any point in the pregnancy. To Savage, a sex-selection abortion is “not gender discrimination” because only “living people” can be discriminated against.
The Mail reports Savage is urging the government to get rid of the law that prohibits sex-selection abortions.
“If a woman does not want to have a foetus who is one sex or the other, forcing her [to go through with the pregnancy] is not going to be good for the eventual child, and it’s not going to be good for [the mother’s] mental health,” she said.
Though sex-selection abortions are illegal, there is evidence that they may be happening anyway. A 2014 study found that there were about 4,700 fewer girls in Britain than what statistics would suggest – leading many to speculate that they may have been aborted, according to the report. In 2013, another British government report also found signs that unborn girls are being targeted for sex-selection abortions.
Further, in 2012, an undercover investigation by the London Telegraph exposed several British abortion doctors who were willing to help facilitate illegal sex-selection abortions.
Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com
Here’s more from the interview:
[M]any NHS hospitals have stopped telling parents the sex of their unborn child at their 12-week scan, instead waiting to 20 weeks, and ‘some hospitals have a policy of not telling patients the sex of their baby’ altogether, according to the NHS Choices website. The 2014 study of census information suggested sex-selective abortions may be a particular issue in Britain’s South Asian communities, where there is a cultural preference for boys.
Prof Savage said: ‘Because of this sort of anxiety some places won’t tell the woman the sex of the foetus, which is outrageous. It’s her body and her foetus, so she should have that information… If a woman does not want to have a foetus who is one sex or the other, forcing her [to go through with the pregnancy] is not going to be good for the eventual child, and it’s not going to be good for [the mother’s] mental health.’
She has previously signed a letter claiming sex-selective abortion is ‘not gender discrimination’ as that term ‘applies only to living people’.
In a follow-up interview, Savage also said women should be allowed to have abortions at any stage of pregnancy, for any reason. Currently, abortions are illegal after 24 weeks in England, excepted in limited circumstances.
“It’s her body,” Savage said. “She is the one taking the risks. The foetus is a potential human life at that stage [in the womb]; it is not an actual human life… I think you’ve got to concentrate on the [rights of the] woman.”
Savage’s comments sparked immediate backlash after the Daily Mail published the interview over the weekend.
Conservative lawmakers, pro-life groups and others quickly responded to her abortion extremism.
“Suggesting that women should be able to abort babies solely because they happen to be either male or, much more usually, female, is utterly abhorrent,” MP Mark Field told the Mail. “To have someone like Wendy Savage with her extreme views at the heart of the BMA is a very worrying sign. The majority of people in this country, even those who support abortion, think sex-selective abortion is a step too far.”
Experts estimate that as many as 200 million girls are missing world-wide because they were aborted based on their sex. Even research from the United Nations, which is no champion of unborn babies’ rights, points to sex-selection abortions as a huge discrimination problem against women and girls.
Evidence of the discriminatory practice is especially strong in Asia. In China, for example, the birth ratio was 115.88 boys to 100 girls in 2014, according to research by the Charlotte Lozier Institute.
The research group said there is evidence that sex-selection abortions are happening in the U.S., too. Sex-selection abortions are illegal in just a handful of states.
“One major study that analyzed U.S. Census data from 2000 found that third births in families of foreign-born Chinese, Indians, and Koreans in the U.S. who already had two daughters displayed a ratio of 151 boys to 100 girls—an extreme male-biased ratio,” according to the research group.
What if I decide I don’t like her and want to terminate her life?
Is it that simple?
Once one accepts “on demand” the rest follows.
“If a woman does not want to have a foetus who is one sex or the other, forcing her [to go through with the pregnancy] is not going to be good for the eventual child, and it’s not going to be good for [the mother’s] mental health,” she said.
Wow. Just, WOW!
So GLAD my Dad didn’t kill us all when Mom only produced useless feeder girls for him!
I HATE the world we’re living in! WHAT is it going to take to make people REALIZE what they have done? Statistically, 32 MILLION murdered Baby Girls since 1972.
Funny. I don’t see any of these self-proclaimed, ‘FEMINISTS’ marching against THAT!
*SPIT*
Self hatred
A Woman wanting to kill her own girl baby
What other moral boundaries are left?
So would it also OUR DECISION that there are too many liberal “perfesers” making too much money and we need take some of them out?
Oh for real anyone with teeth that bad should be promoting good oral hygiene and not the killing of babies. As she ever flossed and brushed a day in her life?
Amazing what happens when liberal narratives meet their logical conclusions. You have a choice...but not that choice women.
So the child in the womb isn’t really alive?
She is a true sociopath, one who gets pleasure out of murder. What the heck is she doing on an *ethics* committee?
pretty sick
I can relate to your remarks! I am the oldest of seven girls. My dad’s friends used to tease him that he was filling the back yard up with girls, trying to get a boy.
Fortunately, we were all born before this demonic infiltration of our culture. I fear the slippery slope here... just a short slip-slide away from ending the lives of the “useless elderly, the handicapped, the mentally ill, and the retarded”... all who cost too much to maintain, since they are “non-productive”.
What a lucky man. Girls take care of Papa in his old age. What I wouldn’t give to have some girls
I agree. The Left cannot maintain a consistent position on anything as they try to reconcile all their lies.
Good last name for a weirdo.
Nothing makes the Socialists happier than finding new ways to ‘normalize’ what the rest of us find abhorrent!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.