Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Haiku Guy

I played a lot of Risk in the past. One weird result I observed was whoever won Europe disproportionally won the game. North American normally was not vital.

I wondered whether it was because it was in the center of the board but came to the conclusion it was better located to attack the other continents and getting 5 extra armies made it more important than Africa.

Not sure if others have drawn the same conclusion.


33 posted on 03/17/2017 8:15:57 AM PDT by alternatives? (Why have an army if there are no borders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: alternatives?

Few things are more painful than stepping on a Risk board piece in your bare feet.


37 posted on 03/17/2017 8:20:30 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: alternatives?

Interesting my strategy was either to take over Australia or South America as a base. You get the continent bonus and have to defend fewer attack routes - and by merely possessing one other territory prevent someone else from gaining a continental bonus (typically mexico or Indonesia).

As to Monopoly I recently saw an article or special about how very rarely are the actual rules followed. If they were the games would actually be much faster. For example: 1) there is an actual limit on houses/hotels if there are no more pieces no one else can buy them. and 2) if someone lands on a place and doesn’t buy the bank is supposed to auction it immediately to the entire player population.


59 posted on 03/17/2017 11:56:11 AM PDT by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson