I think that’s the problem. The definition of “man” in the damaged skulls of these mental patients includes human beings with birth canals (a.k.a, vaginas).
The only thing required to be a male to these sickos in having a short haircut and wearing pants.
Conversely, their definition of “woman” includes penis-owners that wear wigs, dresses, and makeup.
That's a good point. People of their mindset would probably be the first to say that that gender-specific clothing is arbitrary and a complete cultural construct. But when a person "identifies" as the opposite sex, he or she usually winds up wearing the clothes and adopting a hairstyle of the opposite sex. Why can't a woman who identifies as a man still stress as a woman? Why can't a man who identifies as a woman still dress as a man? That would be truly revolutionary.