Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/01/2017 6:58:45 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: BenLurkin

What could go wrong dont mess with mother nature


2 posted on 03/01/2017 6:59:45 PM PST by al baby (Hi Mom Its a Joke friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
Once it's up and running, the libs can move there and turn it into their hell utopia.
3 posted on 03/01/2017 7:00:43 PM PST by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Very cool. Where there is water...there can be beer.


4 posted on 03/01/2017 7:03:35 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

It seems to me that, if they want to grow the atmosphere, they need to grow the mass of the planet. Mars isn’t that much bigger than our moon and its lack of gravitational pull would make it hard to hold onto an atmosphere.


6 posted on 03/01/2017 7:07:41 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
"NASA, take my money... please!"

The future of Man doesn't lie in gravity wells.

7 posted on 03/01/2017 7:07:47 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
The greenhouse effect would start to fill Mars's thin atmosphere and heat the planet, mainly at the equator, at which point the vast stores of ice under the poles would melt and flood the world with liquid water.

Horrible for Earth, but OK on Mars?

9 posted on 03/01/2017 7:14:25 PM PST by Inyo-Mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

NASA is missing a great opportunity. They should restrict movement of people to Mars to only Democrats. Exclude the frozen CO2 since Democrats know that CO2 is VERY harmful and let them live their wonderful Democrat life in a CO2 free atmosphere!


10 posted on 03/01/2017 7:15:58 PM PST by Rembrandt (Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

The cool thing about this, is that if the magnetic poles on Earth are about the change, and if in the interim the magnetic field dies down significantly, then a similar apparatus could be placed between the Sun and Earth during the transition to protect our atmosphere.


11 posted on 03/01/2017 7:16:04 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
This could be a really bad idea


12 posted on 03/01/2017 7:22:33 PM PST by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Here in the U.S. they want to prevent global warming while in space they evidently want to increase global warming.


14 posted on 03/01/2017 7:32:44 PM PST by taxesareforever (Islam is an ideology. It is NOT a religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

I remember an old SF novel - “The Sands of Mars” by Arthur C Clarke. They solved the issue by lighting Deimos on fire to create a new sun IIRC.


15 posted on 03/01/2017 7:33:54 PM PST by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
About 90 percent of Mars's atmosphere was stripped away by solar particles in the lifetime of the planet, which was likely temperate and had surface water about 3.5 billion years ago.

Hmmmm…. So when they figure it out that it was only about 6,000 years ago, I assume that would be a bit of a problem for the theory behind this scheme, no?

19 posted on 03/01/2017 7:39:43 PM PST by hecticskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Liquify the core? That’s a lot of mass.


21 posted on 03/01/2017 7:49:35 PM PST by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

I’ve been turning over ideas for a Mars-global artificial magnetic field for a few months now. If we want to make the planet truly habitable we need to warm it up, but without a magnetic field the solar wind would simply strip it away at a faster rate as heat expansion made the atmosphere larger.

Any global field would require a lot of energy due to the flux, but it wouldn’t have to be very strong at any one point (although I’ve been mulling the benefits of large distributed infrastructure that produce weak fields over a large area vs. large numbers of small infrastructure elements that each produce very strong fields in a small area).

We don’t need a global magnetic field on Mars to establish an outpost, but if we plan to have humans stay there forever, then we do need one. The technology isn’t new by any stretch, but we’ll need to establish real manufacturing on Mars to make it happen.


25 posted on 03/01/2017 8:06:09 PM PST by Windcatcher (Time to fly the other black flag -- one of no quarter for Marxists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

I can’t believe the PC dweeb at the end of the presentation who said that “Let’s take it” sounded imperialistic to him and asked if the presenter was speaking as a human or as a representative of the United States Government. I so wanted to kick him in the sack.


29 posted on 03/01/2017 8:32:17 PM PST by Windcatcher (Time to fly the other black flag -- one of no quarter for Marxists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

In another 500 to 1000 years it might be possible.


30 posted on 03/01/2017 8:33:36 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Wouldnt the water evaporate and block the weak sunlight...cooling the planet? Dont you really need enuf gravity to hold the gases in the atmosphere...for colonization...probably better to construct underground magnetically shielded environment...either way...a daunting problem...will earth last that long? Will our progeny die on a lifeless mars?


32 posted on 03/01/2017 9:42:41 PM PST by Getready (Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

I thought Mar’s relatively weak gravity was the reason for it’s thin atmosphere.


33 posted on 03/01/2017 9:58:38 PM PST by semaj (Audentes fortuna juvat: Fortune favors the bold. Be Bold FRiends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Let’s do it.

Hell, I’ll go...

Hate humans anyway....But, I will need a harem of 150 of your finest women....


34 posted on 03/01/2017 10:15:41 PM PST by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Suddenly occurs to me:
“So you are saying you want to create Global Warming?”

The irony is rich...


35 posted on 03/01/2017 10:16:43 PM PST by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson