what you cut and pasted is not very different from what I said. I know that the city was very involved with the creation of the transit system, for variances and easements as well as eminent domain issues. But people made their fortunes with them before the government took them over and they started operating at a loss as public utilities. As far as the roads, I specifically mentioned the federal government, states and localities are a different animal, constitutionally . As far as your ‘stupid’ remark, f u.
>what you cut and pasted is not very different from what I said. I know that the city was very involved with the creation of the transit system, for variances and easements as well as eminent domain issues.
And capital.
>But people made their fortunes with them before the government took them over and they started operating at a loss as public utilities.
My argument was about infrastructure, not operation. You’re conflating 2 different issues because I kicked your butt on the infrastructure argument. Very dishonest on your part.
> As far as the roads, I specifically mentioned the federal government, states and localities are a different animal, constitutionally .
The distinction is pointless because they’re both government. I’m talking from a broader context on what works, not getting wonky over the Constitution.
>As far as your stupid remark, f u.
Right back you, chief. Did you know that Libertarians where allied with the Communists during the Spanish civil war? Their whole unworkable, utopian lie filled philosophy made a lot more sense after I learned that. Cheerio!