“America needs a new political party, one opposed to isolationism, protectionism, nativism, authoritarianism, and ecologism, and which supports free enterprise, Constitutional government, human equality, liberty, and dignity, and the defensive alliance of all nations committed to such ideals.”
Some of those ideals are diametrically opposed to one another another...
They oppose isolationism and authoritarianism, but want world wide military interventionism.....
human equality as defined by SJWs goes counter to actual liberty.......
what about the nativism of other countries, are we going to now force japan to to take in barbarians????
This is why libertarians are mostly psychotic as the left, many of their ideals conflict with one another...
>
This is why libertarians are mostly psychotic as the left, many of their ideals conflict with one another...
>
Almost got whip-lash going to left-field, no? How did this hypothetical ‘Liberal’ group get equated w/ (L), when they agree w/ the issue you posed?
Which ‘conflicts’ do *you* see? The (R) can’t even pass a CC w/o it being a blank check; ‘high ranking’ party members calling for WWIII; ‘comprehensive immigration’; DHS\NSA\TSA...Which of those were (L) ideals, some of which came to pass??
Now, I give my (L) brethren their dues re: borders, abortion, etc. (for F* sake, Gary J.!? WTH?!?!), but your equating the two ranks up there w/ Milo being a fascist Nazi /s
Least (L) aren’t talking outta both sides of their mouths (Gary J.??...UHHH.).