By it’s very duty of protecting the constitution, the court SHOULD BE 100% conservative.
That’s the point of conservatism in the United States.
This point shouldn’t be glossed over. Conservatives are not pushing some ideology. All they stand for is original intent. That we be guided by the supreme law of the land—the US Constitution. And that judges simply interpret the document as it is written.
Liberals, on the other hand, are marinated in ideology, completely unmoored from the Constitution. That’s why there is so much dissonance in their platform. They want to make up the rules as they go along to suit their social engineering goals. They have no core.
We have the Divinely inspired Constitution.
The appointment of Gorsuch means there will be three reliably conservative justices on the court. That’s it.
By it’s very duty of protecting the constitution, the court SHOULD BE 100% conservative.
*********************************
I completely agree.
But even here on Free Republic, the most conservative site on the Web, there are many who won’t protect the Constitution because it says that their favorite politician can’t be President.
The Kenyanesian Usurpation should have been proof enough for anyone of the wisdom of the founders that only a natural born citizen, naturally a citizen because they were born here of citizen parents, solely an American, could not possibly be anything else, no divided loyalties, may be President.
It isn’t a conservative advantage that we want.
We want a Constitutional advantage.