Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: colorado tanker; Homer_J_Simpson; HandyDandy; DiogenesLamp; henkster
The Scott Decision did not rest on the Full Faith and Credit Clause.

That is my understanding as well. The reason the FF&C clause was not used was because instead, Taney argued that neither the feds nor any state could prohibit slavery. That was grossly inaccurate. Until the 13th -15th Amendments, slavery was an issue of each sovereign state.

I think FF&C probably would have been effective in this case as even just recently, Congress had to pass DOMA to prevent FF&C from operating in gay marriage issues between states.

84 posted on 02/18/2017 3:38:25 PM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Jim 0216
Don't forget the public policy exception. Judges were using it to override DOMA before the Obergfell decision.

FF&C has had little application over time.

89 posted on 02/18/2017 4:30:45 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson