Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: boatbums

Courts get it wrong again.


2 posted on 01/31/2017 7:32:50 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lurkinanloomin

I wonder what Mr. Gorsuch’s opinion on this ruling would be? I have not heard how strongly he has supported the 2nd amendment in the past.


8 posted on 01/31/2017 7:40:39 PM PST by hardspunned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurkinanloomin

It’s worse than you think. If the court can get the ‘inherently dangerous’ idiocy to stick, it opens gun owners and manufacturers up for strict liability; that is, liability without a showing of fault. The law recognizes certain activities as so inherently dangerous, there is no way to make them safe. Thus, whomever is engaged in such activities is automatically liable for any injuries or damage without a showing of any negligence or misconduct.

Open the floodgates.

The gun grabbers have wanted this language for a long, long time. Thank God we have President Trump and he’s going to appoint sound justices.


10 posted on 01/31/2017 7:43:23 PM PST by jazminerose (Adorable Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson