[wtd]

Stuart Varney's report identifies this as a "deal". A "deal" suggests a trade or exchange of similarly valued considerations.

What did Loretta Lynch receive in exchange for her signature/complicity in this unconstitutional act/"deal"?

Loretta Lynch does not possess the authority to override the Constitution of the United States, nor does she have the authority to negate The Fourth Amendment.

[bgill]

The Terrorist in Chief and Lynch don’t need no stinkin’ Constitution.