Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai

This bill doesn’t make any sense. If emotional distress is a predictable complication of abortion that is discussed with the patient prior to the procedure during the review of risks and “benefits”, then how could one sue when that complication actually took place?


8 posted on 01/18/2017 6:05:57 AM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: johniegrad
If emotional distress is a predictable complication of abortion that is discussed with the patient prior to the procedure during the review of risks and “benefits”

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!

You really think the baby-killers honestly discuss anything with their "patients"?

Planned Barrenhood is still peddling the "blob of tissue" lie.

10 posted on 01/18/2017 6:09:09 AM PST by NorthMountain (Washington Post is Fake News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: johniegrad

You’re missing the point.

It’s a move to make feminists live by the same legal doctrines they advocate for.


12 posted on 01/18/2017 6:17:05 AM PST by papertyger (The semantics define how we think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson