Because it’s considered Islamophobic.
Hey as long as the ones harming women are Muslim then its all good..remember, liberals adore Islam, they hate America as much as Muslims do so that is their bond
...it’s called selective rage
That's a really good question. The women's lib folks are very vocal. But they are strangely silent when it comes to the Muslim abuse of women.
The same goes for the children's rights crowd. They are very vocal. But they are strangely silent when it comes to the Muslim abuse of children.
And the same goes for the gay rights crowd. They are very vocal. But they are strangely silent when it comes to the Muslim abuse of gays.
Wait a minute...I'm starting to see a pattern here.
Many of us have been asking this for quite some time. Never get a response.
But then again hypocrisy is hard to defend.
To wit: “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.”
The enemy of the Left is the Right.
Someone who is the avowed enemy of the Right is, by Leftist axiom, a friend of the Left ... even if that someone would stone/decapitate/hurtle a Leftist at first opportunity, even before slaying a Rightist, for wantonly engaging in egregious transgressions of that someone’s axioms.
The Left _claims_ to be for broadly-defined human rights, but oppressors of those rights are quickly excused so long as they’re in conflict with the Right. Ergo, Trump is a “misogynist” for a few crude remarks in private despite running beauty pageants, marrying supermodels, and filling hotels with attractive women ... but Islam is to be respected for subjugating women, genital mutilation thereof, and vicious/terminal abuse because the philosophy irritates Republicans.
This is probably their plan for the women here. It would explain why they’ve dumbed them down for decades with feminism and other communist propaganda. I guess liberal women have no problems being treated like this since they’re so silent about it.