Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Louis Foxwell
Both of these playwrights wrote for the common man. Hamilton is a rarified bit of pietistic foppery intended for the liberal/progressive elite.

It's the nature of live New York professional theater that most ordinary people can't afford it, so that complaint fits any Broadway or Off-Broadway musical.

And if you hear plays or musicals praised it's usually by liberals in the media, that's pretty much a given for any work.

There's a contradiction or disconnect in the article: the play is bad, the lyrics are bad, but somehow it's aimed at an elite.

If it's that bad maybe the story is aimed at a particularly low, unintelligent, and undemanding audience but only rich New Yorkers, most of whom have liberal views, can afford to see it.

I'd say, judge the thing on its own merits or lack thereof, not because you identify it with some opposing political camp

And really, did anybody say it was an eternal masterpiece, or did they just enjoy a night out that they could justify with the pretense that they'd learned something?

22 posted on 01/14/2017 10:49:51 AM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: x

If the music is any indication, it actually is pretty bad. I’ll just point out that aesthetic sense among the left has totally evaporated. Case in point, the eight year love affair with Michelle Obama’s fashion sense. They’ve finally succeeded in degrading western art to the point that they can’t even distinguish good from bad themselves anymore.


24 posted on 01/14/2017 10:53:41 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson