Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: snarkpup
Back in the '70s I lived on the shore of one of New York's Finger Lakes, at the very north end of Cayuga Lake, above the discharge from the feed mill.

Carp of the size of that eelpout infested the waters, and so did catfish in the dredged barge channel, but large-mouth bass there were dying of old age. Bass are tasty, like flounder. If I caught a bass less than three pounds, I tossed it back in to grow some more.

No carp or catfish for me, and this eelpout looks to be in that class of trash fish. We just hooked the carp with a gaff and left them back to swim away and die. Some peo[le said that soaking carp fillets in milk would get rid of the muddy taste when baked. I tried it once, and it did not work, a waste of time and good milk.

Pan fish were aplenty, and three or four fresh-caught, filleted, skinned, and butter-fried bluegills were a prince's meal matching any aquatic delicacy around the globe.

Next to walleyed pike, that is.

18 posted on 01/06/2017 8:35:41 PM PST by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: imardmd1

Throw back anything under 3 pounds? Why? It has been my experience that those under 3 pounds are the best eating. In fact, by time they get up to 5 pounds, they are not even close to as good to eat as the smaller ones.

About 1 to 2 pounds for large mouth bass, to eat, are the best you can get.IMHO.


22 posted on 01/07/2017 6:07:08 AM PST by weezel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson