Posted on 12/27/2016 10:39:07 AM PST by nikos1121
I can understand that during a primary and presidential campaign, anything goes, but once someone is elected president, at what point does a threat to release damaging information, that is not supported in fact, become black mail?
Shouldn't the secret service approach Tom Arnold?
So far, no one is corroborating Arnold's claims. Snopes says it's unproven.
If he has the material, why is he threatening our president? What is his intent?
What do others think?
Release it. No one will care.
He’s trying to leverage a spot to sing at the inauguration.
If they exist, then a lot more people than Tom Arnold have access to them. If they exist, the studio and production company are probably afraid of violating non disclosures.
Interesting because he best friend is Schwartzenegger and he is the new Apprentice Boss. Why would he do this now. What purpose does it do? Attention whores.
He’s made statements that it will bring down the presidency.
why didn’t he release this stuff sooner? what’s the point to do it now, other to harm our country?
I didn’t say it would work, I was replying that was his intent.
Do it, fat ass.
There must be dozens of crew members who had/have ‘Apprentice’ outtakes or knowledge of what he claims. Where are they to support or refute this garbage?
Much ado about nothing.
Attempts to delegitimize or undermine our president are attempts to undermine our nation. If he keeps playing that game, I wish nothing but the absolute worst on him.
He would have used it before the election and been a hero to some for stopping Trump if he had it. So he is blowing smoke
I would think Trump has some contract that protects him from people releasing out takes, or other film of him in the Apprentice. So, if Arnold is trying to make money, then Trump will sue not only Arnold but anyone else involved.
I would think he could sue the current producers of the Apprentice.
In short, it seems like it would be stupid on his part to do this.
So, back to my point. When should the SS step in, in any case of someone “threatening” the president either physically or in this fashion? We’re not talking about free speech here.
Last week when this story FReeped, someone thought Tom Arnold was married to Rosie O’Donnell. They were corrected. He was married to Rosanne Barr.
And then someone else FReeped that there was no real big difference between either one of those two cows.
There must be dozens of crew members who had/have Apprentice outtakes or knowledge of what he claims. Where are they to support or refute this garbage?
—
The loser also said 100s have seen the video. If that was the case, it would have been out long ago.
I still ‘like’ the version of the story where someone was reviewing what Trump had said and the words he had used and someone commented.
Sounds like Trump was quoting the lyrics of some rap song.
Tom Arnold?? Didn’t he get famous by marrying Roseanne Barr? That Tom Arnold?
Why would Arnold have outtakes of The Apprentice?
the article claims that Schwartzenegger told him to release the tapes. I find this hard to believe. In fact, looks like he backtracked and said he was referring to someone else.
For liberals, the election is never over until their candidate is in office. So let’s get that point clear
Past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior.
After all, he married Roseanne as a stepping stone to stardom, and I think it’s a loose version of extortion, hoping Trump will give him a bundle to drop the video thing.
I put him on the Dixie Chicks list, I even deleted “True Lies from my DVR.
I have video of Tom Arnold sexually molesting underage sheep! It’s TRUE! And as soon as I can find it again I’ll post it!
(Now everyone talk about it as if it’s true!)
What if PEOTUS has a few tapes of Tom & Rozie?
Releasing them would advance Tom to C star rating.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.