Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JimSEA

I’ve read previously where there were massive, wide-spread extinctions of megafauna shortly after humans arrived anywhere, and that widespread forest fires were the simplest way to explain which species survived and didn’t. It was speculated that the fires were the result of humans.


11 posted on 12/06/2016 10:11:19 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dangus

It’s possible.

You can do a lot when you’re at the top of the food chain.


15 posted on 12/06/2016 10:13:44 AM PST by Bratch ("The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: dangus

The problem there is two fold, one the great beasties couldn’t forage in a forest and secondly the ocean and lake core samples don’t support such a massive conflagration. I support the, no single fire but mammoth meat is tasty theory. That plus there was drastically less tundra environment and more grassland (something the lake core samples and Greenland ice cores do support). Grass is hard to eat and digest.


36 posted on 12/06/2016 10:50:30 AM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson