Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: morphing libertarian

I’ll go with the evidence. I have seen no compelling evidence to convince me Oswald was not acting alone.


41 posted on 12/04/2016 11:05:28 AM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Jim 0216

There are many factors when deciding who committed a crime. One is who was the shooter(s). Knowing who the shooter was is one thing and I give that about 72.5% on Oswald, knowing if he was acting alone including someone handling him is another. Joesph Bonanno said it was the mafia and there were three shooters in the plaza.

The motivation element is the most cluttered. I like LBJ just because he is the strongest most obvious answer to the question. “Who benefited?” Always a basic question when detectives do there work.

The mafia certainly had motivation and ability to pull it off. If I was castro, I would have paid someone to do it after the Bay of Pigs and finding out the Kennedys were trying to kill me.

Lack of evidence is not proof that something did or didn’t happen a particular way. Oswald said he was a patsy. Is that evidence?

The mafia and LBJ were not stupid. They got away with hundreds of crimes. Easy suspects.


43 posted on 12/04/2016 11:19:08 AM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson