House Quietly Passes Bill Targeting "Russian Propaganda" Websites (Drudge, ZeroHedge, etc)

“To be accurate, that list of sites was not created by Mr. Durden. It was created by an organization called PropOrNot, which was subsequently referenced by the Washington Post”

I know that the hate list is from a wholly owned subsidiary of Jeff ‘Dr. Evil’ Bezos, but I’m still not worried. I think Alphabet/Google is looking down the barrel of an antitrust lawsuit under the Trump admin. Shenanigans like this only serve to accelerate that happening.

Again, I say, here is your bull horn, be loud. Here is your shovel, keep digging. I invite them to piss off the new sheriff.

“Granted, any actual action would have to come through an organization within the executive branch, but the committee being created will contain high level executive branch members who would have such capacity.”

Which is fine. Unless you believe that under a Trump admin that those under his charge are going to come to the conclusion that certain websites need to be shut down as part of the threat assessment. I don’t think that would happen. And, if it did, I think they will hit the Brick wall of the first amendment heard before a Supreme Court with a conservative majority.

Still not worried. Yea, we’ve fought hard. But calling BS on a yappy lap dog does not mean I, personally, have stopped fighting. I’m just calling out Zerohedge for taking this to the Nth degree without taking a look at the really real world we are in. The view presented in the article is projected though the lense of 2012, that is not our current reality.

I truly do respect your point of view, much respect. You are correct in saying we must not become complacent. It’s always good to have a healthy amount of suspicion WTR our overlords. Wouldn’t it be nice if the Trump admin could win trust for a change? It would certainly be a first for me.

Unless you believe that under a Trump admin that those under his charge are going to come to the conclusion that certain websites need to be shut down as part of the threat assessment. I don’t think that would happen...The view presented in the article is projected though the lense of 2012, that is not our current reality.

I agree that appears less likely than the Obama administration, as of today. But let's say Trump starts swinging full establishment at some point, and starts breaking a lot of his biggest promises to the ones that elected him, such as reneging on building a wall, or deporting criminal aliens? Then as a result, many of the US-based sites on that hit list start coming out against him? This is of course assuming he gets cleanly through the recount process, and electoral college voting. My point is, take nothing for granted.

I truly do respect your point of view, much respect. You are correct in saying we must not become complacent. It’s always good to have a healthy amount of suspicion WTR our overlords.

Yes Sir, it is. They are politicians, after all. Great discussion, and I'm just as hopeful as you are we may have finally turned a corner with the election of Trump. Not just putting our hopes in him, but in the people of this country that finally want to make it great again. And if that happens, a lot of the paranoia might start to slightly fade.

Exactly right. I looked at the list of who voted for what.

Remember the mass hysteria that took us into Iraq? This is just like that and it has everything to do with Obama being found out by most of those publications. It has nothing to do with Russis.

I am ashamed of the GOP. They were so railroaded and it will bite them in the butt.

We need a third party...maybe the Constitutionalist.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.