[Ingtar]

They asked for several counties. However, the state rules are a full recount.

[EQAndyBuzz]

I won’t believe the law is on the people’s side until January 20.

[goldstategop]

That’s the way it is since Bush Vs Gore.

Stein obviously is looking to uncover more D votes in Milwaukee and Dane.

Rest of the rest would uncover more R votes for Trump.

That’s exactly why she is asking for a recount in only some counties.

Not allowed.

[Starboard]

They asked for several counties. However, the state rules are a full recount.

*************

So will Stein then have enough money to pay for a FULL recount? She could come up short if that’s the case.

[dglang]

There were 100 counties selected by the state for a ROUTINE "audit" to ensure that all the machines in those counties worked correctly. This is different than a full recount either required by law or requested by a candidate.

It is the routine audit which has begun, not the recount.

The state hasn't yet determined the cost of the recount, the last recount conducted was several years ago and for a much smaller number of votes.

This recount could cost over twice as much as the last one and the requesting party might not yet have enough money to pay for it especially since the cost hasn't been established yet.

The recount can't even begin until the candidate pays the total cost of the recount.