Posted on 11/25/2016 2:43:54 PM PST by doghorse
In practice though to apply equal treatment, all counties have to be looked at.
Which defeats the purpose of picking certain counties to recount.
Unless they're GOPe #nevertrumpers.
That’s different from cherry-picking counties to favor or disfavor a candidate.
“T refuse to generate any ballots!”
This is time to exert our 2nd amendment prerogative against tyranny. And a warning should be issued to any usurper wannabe that ‘finding’ 22k votes, all for Hillary is not a good life decision.
Good points...
NPR is reporting that Wisconsin will do a statewide recount.
How the Walker admin. and AG (who is a republican) gotten involved yet? They should be apply EXTRA SCRUTINY to any possible shenanigans.
oops typos. *has. and *applying
goldstategop wrote: “In practice though to apply equal treatment, all counties have to be looked at.”
Probably so, but that would take another federal court case since Wisconsin law specifically allows selective recounts.
In other words, not going to happen.
The FL gap between Bush and Gore in 2000 was 537 votes! And even that wasn't enough to overturn.
I see President-Elect Donald Trump is giving this nonsense exactly the amount of attention it deserves.
The final vote in Florida 2000 was won by Bush by 537 votes over what’s his name.
Recounting the POTUS? That is under a federal jurisdiction and consistency and fairness are very important otherwise the recount results may be invalidated.
“I expect petition to be denied.”
Are you sure there isn’t a pedophile, Clinton Machine WI judge who could be black mailed into allowing it?
Green Bay is not a liberal city.
Jill Stein requested a hand count according to those links. That does require a judge’s order.
http://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/11/25/recount-would-have-move-quickly/94417686/
I meant in terms of size, they have a higher density of libs because they just are a bigger city. Especially in that area of the state. Bigger cities just draw more liberals to them because big cities have the welfare and social services libs push for, and they need bigger populations to shake money from for their schemes.
I don’t see how ‘statewide’ is better for Trump
that ‘a few selected counties’.
I contend that a few rotten counties
could ‘find’ some more votes,
and the honest counties’ tally won’t change.
please discuss
The ones that give them the result they want.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.