Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sit-rep

Maybe it is part of the planned reduction in manning. Smaller crews are great, until you need to fight or save the ship.


15 posted on 11/23/2016 3:46:53 AM PST by USNBandit (Sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: USNBandit

That has been one of my big concerns, the push towards greater automation of damage control and other systems.

Like you said, it is great when you have intact power supplies and infrastructure, but...when power is lost...or a missile takes out a section of wiring.

Sure, you can probably set up patch lines and such, but...that won’t be automated. Someone is going to have to do that.

And what about simply having people who can use timbers and such to plug holes in the hull?

Couple the automation with a higher percentage of female crewmembers who lack the physical strength of their male counterparts, and you have ships sinking when they might be saved.

I think it is a bad idea, and short-sighted. This whole thing is a damned goat rodeo.


27 posted on 11/23/2016 4:21:16 AM PST by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson