Posted on 10/26/2016 6:15:38 PM PDT by TigerClaws
Cadell stated if a poll has university in the title, it is garbage.
We’re going to win and win big. The election isn’t close. Hillary is going to lose big. Bigger than any election since 1980. The only reason you think it’s close is because of the propaganda. This is Americas Brexit.
I need to correct my previous “Hillary sign count”. I forgot I saw one Hillary sign in Waynesburg, (Greene county, PA) near the college.
So, in Greene, Washington, and a small part of Allegheny counties that I drove all last week, I saw two Hillary signs total.
Trump sign count remains overwhelming.
I hope and pray PA goes in the Trump column by landslide proportions.
Very good observation.
I’m glad that voters are now dealing with the deep inadequacies of GOP Inc. Win or lose, that’s a good thing. This crew is useless.
Well said RWL,
Yes, the fraud in philly is legendary. Whoever was running that operation in 2008 and 2012 was pushing a narrative that black districts should vote for the first Halfrican American president, and they did: 110%. Pennsylvania wasn’t even close to flipping.
Will the democrat machine be able to get such an audacious outcome for the hildabeast? I doubt it, but they don’t need 110% of the inner city vote to win, so I’m still worried.
If we can each get a “fence sitter” in a swing state to watch Trump’s speech the other day at the old post office, he will win.
He is subdued, but so strong, and so focused. He may be reading from the TelePrompter, but it sure doesn’t come off that way - everyone needs to see this!
In a fair election, yes, it isn’t even close. But Soros has had over a year to hatch, fund, and implement fraud in heretofore unprecedented numbers. The scope of their machinations, just from what has been exposed thus far, is breath-taking in its breadth and depth.
It’s my understanding that the UK voting system is far less “contaminated”, in that they utilize a paper ballot system. It has also been said that the Queen was quietly in favor of the exit, and many there credit the Brexit success to her quiet approval.
It is comforting to keep our focus on a Trump landslide. It’s also wise to keep our eyes wide open and be cognizant of the brazen and open lawbreaking that is being committed, with not only approval, but guidance from the nation’s highest, corrupt leaders.
Here’s hoping such is the case. I’m just wary of what the ‘Rats can pull. Remember the outright fraud in the MN Senate race that put goofy Al Franken in office. And they stole the WA governors race from Dino Rossi (the first election they were in) in broad daylight by all of 130 votes or so. The press just winked and laughed it off, too bad, so sad. Well, screw them. If it is close and there is fraud, even to the tune of a few hundred votes here and there, we need to get behind out candidate and fight it. No more lying down for the ‘Rats.
So, here’s a thought, and I was wondering what you think. Election after election we have seen our candidates pull ahead on the rural and suburban vote, then wait while the big city votes were reported because supposedly it “took time” to count all those precincts. What do you think would happen if the precincts in the rural and suburban areas would wait to report their tallies because it “took time” to tally all those votes from the far flung areas, and waited to see what the city votes was, and, golly gee wilikers, the rural and suburban votes would then be reported and it would be “just enough” to push our candidates ahead. Surprise, surprise, surprise. Do you think that would fly?
If the election was going to be close, in PA, then yes fraud could be a factor... but if Trump pulls the number he should, and Hillary gets the numbers I expect, fraud isn’t going to cost the election. Hillary and the dems can’t manufacture hundreds of thousands of votes... 30,000 out of Philly? Sure, no doubt they can do that if they had to, 100,000+? Not really likely.
If Clinton were to win PA by 30k or less, I’ll be the loudest voice screaming for him to contest the results... because I have no doubt in my mind the Dems machine can put that many fraudulent votes in there in PA... Last election there were serveral districts in Philly where Romney got 0 votes... nearly 20,000 total votes cast in these districts, and not a single Romney vote... that’s clearly fraud... but Romney likely would have gotten no more than 2,000 of those 20,000 votes... and he lost the state by roughly 300,000.. .so its hard to argue the fraud cost him the election.
Time will tell, right now the injunction request by Trump/R’s against the law PA limiting poll watchers can only watch polls in the county they live will be interesting... Should Trump/R get this overturned by election day, Philly will have a harder time getting away with a lot of the shenanigans they pull because folks will be watching for it... instead of being the look out for folks who are doing it.
Don’t get me wrong, I am not remotely saying there will be no fraud out of Dems and Hillary particularly in the Philly area. What I am saying is, if this plays out the way I think it will, Trumps going to put too many votes in the box for the Philly fraud be enough to counter it.
Last weekend I and my wife attended the Trump speech in Gettysburg. I have been skeptical about Trump since day one. In my opinion Rubio or Cruz would be the nominee, but as we have seen they both fizzled out. I was very surprised to see Trump as the nominee. Trump had a lifetime of silly statements and actions to overcome, plus his attacks on the party during the primary. Regardless, Hillary is an incredibly corrupt person and terrible choice for president and the US would be hard pressed to survive 4 years of her plus Obama 8 years and all of their social engineering to the country. So I became a lukewarm supporter of Trump. That is until I heard his speech. It was probably the finest political speech I have ever heard. Halfway through I was saying to myself - “I like this guy.” I was amazed at how much he has matured as a candidate. He appears to have been humbled and has a greater appreciation for those who make this country run and the challenges we go through. Trump is an independent, non-political novice, much like Eisenhower, who is quickly becoming the right man at the right hour. His 28 actions laid out in his speech hit many of the same notes that Cruz was hitting. If Trump is successful he will be thoroughly hated by the establishment of both parties. I live in the DC area and I see the bubble the establishment of both parties operate in and I look forward to seeing it popped. The speech contained great stuff and the right stuff for this country.
During my time in Gettysburg I met with senior Trump and GOP officials and discussed Trump’s chances in Pennsylvania. In their opinion his chances are very good. Here are some keys points we talked about in support of their optimism:
—100k Democrats switched their party registration to Republican for 2016 election.
—250k more GOP registered voters in the state.
—People from all walks of life who have not been part of the political process have come out of the woodwork in support of Trump. They told about a 90 years old couple, who never voted in their life, who registered to vote in order to keep Hillary out of office. This is happening everyday.
—Trump and Pence are drawing huge crowds and there is almost no enthusiasm for Hillary.
—Counties in Western PA that went to Obama 55% - 45% in 2012 are trending 65%-35% for Trump.
—3-5 counties won by Obama are expected to go to Trump.
—Local councilman from South Philly was quoted as saying all his constituents are talking about is Trump, Trump and more Trump.
—Polling from a few weeks ago indicated that 1 in 5 voters from Philly is expected to vote for Trump. Normally, 1 in 8 votes Republican. This is huge if it happens. 12% increase in an area that contains 40% of the vote and most of the dead bodies.
—Finally, Obama carried the state by a little over 320k votes in 2012. If the above aforementioned numbers hold up the Obama margin has been eliminated.
Given the lack of enthusiasm for Hillary, the shift registration and increase in GOP participation, in spite of the establishment, Pennsylvania is very winnable for Trump. Internal polling has him within 3 points. However, they tell me they are having difficulty getting a true picture of the electorate due to the sheer number of new participants in the process. It is going to be an interesting 10-12 days to the election.
The problem is that conservatives by nature are not sneaky dirty tricksters, they don’t want to play mind games, they just want to vote and let the chips fall where they may, and have an honest count.
It’s not that conservatives are too stupid to know they are being cheated - they know, but you’ll never get them to lower themselves to that level.
I think some precinct heads need to be caught cheating and thrown in jail. It’s a very serious crime and there need to be real consequences.
Does anyone know of people getting locked up for election fraud?
I’ve often thought the same thing, chimera (GMTA!).
If the rural/suburban areas waited, the top officials would step in, but I suspect it wouldn’t be in favor of us. I also think Phila/Pitt would report, then we would report, and then they would come back again with “newly discovered” additional votes that “Oh my goodness, well look what we found here!”.
Doesn’t it seem like as soon as we figure out how to combat their evil, that they always seem to come up with yet another way to steal it. It is coming from the top, both parties are in collusion.
Until there is a spiritual awakening/renewal in this country, and integrity of the common man is restored as it once was, I don’t envision an end to the corruption.
That is their pattern. How many times were votes "discovered" in the Franken-Coleman contest? Boxes of votes in trunks of cars, all marked in favor of Franken, and so forth. I remember in the first Rossi-Fraudoire contest for WA governor the 'Rats in King County (Seattle) kept "finding" missing votes, in places like locked rooms, the sleeves of voting machines, things like that. All the "missing" votes were cast for the 'Rat. The 'Rats are nothing if not creative in manufacturing fraudulent votes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.