Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MomwithHope

Let’s correct one error that I have seen numerous times on threads where pardons are discussed: The President can issue a pardon for ‘crimes’ that may have been committed so as to prevent charges being filed for said crimes.


10 posted on 10/24/2016 5:50:16 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (She calls me Mr. Deplorable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Michael.SF.

The wording of the Constitution says the President “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.”

In the definitions I’ve looked at, both Reprieves and Pardons deal with convictions, with the penalty due (reprieve) or imposed (pardon). Despite what Gerry Ford did for Nixon, I question whether a pardon can be issued to avoid charges that haven’t been brought. And could such a “pardon” be challenged?

Of course, any such challenge would require Congress to grow a spine, so that avenue might be moot.

In any event, the Constitutional provision applies only to federal offenses. I forget, where are the Clinton Foundation offices located again?


29 posted on 10/24/2016 6:24:46 AM PDT by DNME (This is the tyranny that the Founders warned us about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson