Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TomGuy

Before windows 95 windows 1, 2 and 3 were just gui shells overlaying the dos o/s.


16 posted on 10/23/2016 9:05:11 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Secret Agent Man
> Before windows 95 windows 1, 2 and 3 were just gui shells overlaying the dos o/s.

Win95 and Win98 still were just GUI applications that ran over MS-DOS. They largely supplanted the MS-DOS underlayment with Windows equivalents, but it was still really a DOS app. WinME tried harder to hide that fact, and that's one of the things that made WinME such a dog.

It wasn't until Win2K (actually NT5) that an MS-DOS-less Windows was made available to the general public. (NT4 was a bit over the top for average users.)

And they still had to provide CMD.EXE because there are some things that a GUI just won't do.

36 posted on 10/23/2016 10:23:18 PM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man
Win95 was too. The first where the GUI and graphic user inter-phase were integrated was Win98.

I began using Linux in 1994. The GUI is still separate, you can choose one or several inter-phases. I love XFCE GUI. Have been using it since Redhat 8.0 came out. It was not part of the package, I added it.

Over the past 10 years, it is rare that I use a Windows OS.

I almost never have a system hangup and have never had a Malware exploit.

51 posted on 10/24/2016 3:28:13 AM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson