Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RIP, Schiaparelli: European Mars Lander's Crash Site Seen By NASA Probe
Space.com ^ | October 21, 2016 02:56pm ET | Mike Wall,

Posted on 10/21/2016 2:24:09 PM PDT by BenLurkin

The lander, named Schiaparelli, stopped communicating with mission control about 1 minute before its planned touchdown on Mars Wednesday morning (Oct. 19). Newly released photos of the landing site by NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) seem to confirm what ExoMars team members had suspected — that Schiaparelli died a violent death.

The photos show a bright feature consistent with the lander's 39-foot-wide (12 meters) parachute, as well as a 50-by-130-foot (15 by 40 m) dark patch likely created by the lander's impact, ESA officials said.

"Estimates are that Schiaparelli dropped from a height of between 2 and 4 kilometers [1.2 to 2.5 miles], therefore impacting at a considerable speed, greater than 300 km/h [186 mph]," ESA officials wrote in an update today (Oct. 21).

"The relatively large size of the feature would then arise from disturbed surface material," they added. "It is also possible that the lander exploded on impact, as its thruster propellant tanks were likely still full. These preliminary interpretations will be refined following further analysis."

ExoMars team members think those tanks were still full because Schiaparelli's data indicate that the lander didn't fire its descent-slowing thrusters nearly as long as it was supposed to, ESA officials have said.

(Excerpt) Read more at space.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy
KEYWORDS: duplicate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Magnum44

“Ack ack ack ack.....”


21 posted on 10/21/2016 2:50:41 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The Europeans had a very poor plan for landing the Schiaparelli. The plan was to open the parachute upon impact, and then turn the reverse thrust on. Didn’t work, and the Martians are very angry. Who knows, that crash-landing probably wiped out the only traces of life on the planet.


22 posted on 10/21/2016 2:56:23 PM PDT by adorno (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
You would think they would bounce a radar signal off the ground or something.

Instead, they bounced the whole craft.
23 posted on 10/21/2016 2:57:41 PM PDT by adorno (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: edh

Someone suggested that the conversion would be fast & complete if only Google would simply refuse to return results in imperial units.


24 posted on 10/21/2016 3:00:25 PM PDT by ctdonath2 ("If anyone will not listen to your words, shake the dust from your feet and leave them." - Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Is this the planet made of cheese?


25 posted on 10/21/2016 3:02:33 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
The Metric system helps those who count on their fingers and toes. The Imperial system benefits everybody with the use of highly composite numbers.


Nailed It !


26 posted on 10/21/2016 3:04:45 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

A lot of thruster fuel is hypo-whatsit. Boom.


27 posted on 10/21/2016 3:15:53 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Our government agencies can locate a crash site millions and millions of miles away on a hostile planet, but can’t find 30,000 e-mails on a plastic and metal box here on Earth?


28 posted on 10/21/2016 3:37:34 PM PDT by Ciaphas Cain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

29 posted on 10/21/2016 3:42:15 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Yep, the good Lord took a liking to the probe and blew it up good!


30 posted on 10/21/2016 3:47:44 PM PDT by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Rack! Rack!


31 posted on 10/21/2016 3:49:01 PM PDT by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Good thing they weren’t spending their own money.


32 posted on 10/21/2016 3:50:14 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Hillary Clinton, the elderly woman's version of "I dindu nuffins.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

I’m sure they used hydrazine and nitrogen tetroxide!


33 posted on 10/21/2016 3:55:46 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-blogs/astronomy-space-david-dickinson/schiaparelli-lander-mars/

The ballistic entry of Schiaparelli is closer to that of the Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunity than the guided entry of Curiosity. “The EDM is Europe’s first try at landing on Mars, and as landing systems go, it is pretty ambitious,” says Jorge Vago (ESA’s ExoMars Project Scientist). “Schiaparelli incorporates a sophisticated Doppler radar to measure distance to the ground and speed over the surface. The information is used to command the

pulsed hydrazine engines,

which are organized in three clusters of three motors each.”


34 posted on 10/21/2016 4:01:39 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

With today’s launch, Europe and Russia seek to break the Mars “curse”
http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/03/with-todays-launch-europe-and-russia-seek-to-break-the-mars-curse/

THE MARS CURSE
http://www.universetoday.com/13267/the-mars-curse-why-have-so-many-missions-failed/

With ExoMars, will Russia break its “Mars Curse?”
http://www.reallycoolblog.com/with-exomars-will-russia-break-its-mars-curse/


35 posted on 10/21/2016 4:04:14 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The photos show a bright feature consistent with the lander's 39-foot-wide (12 meters) parachute...

Parachute? I see the problem.

36 posted on 10/21/2016 4:04:42 PM PDT by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I’m shocked pink!


37 posted on 10/21/2016 4:43:38 PM PDT by Zirondelle ("disce aut discede")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edh

Wrong.

Engineering (machining) needs 1/10 of 1/1000 of an inch accuracies and definitions (screw threads, finishes, cuts, parts and die machining, tolerances, nozzle and gasket sizes, bolt holes, nuts, grinding grit, filters, seals, shaft clearances, etc.), and metric just can’t handle it without thousandths of a decimal place.

Which puts you right back where you are complaining now: millimeters are too “big” to be useful.


38 posted on 10/21/2016 5:42:52 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Metric works fine at deep submicron levels for integrated circuit design and fabrication. It also works great for PCB design (though we typically adopt a mil as a base unit for trace width ... 1/1000 inch ... Though I trust you’re familiar with it). Then again, in each case, you’re already working on a nm or mm scale overall and sizes are relatively close to one another.

I can’t see how one fractional unit is a bigger PITA than another. I’m probably biased since the work I do works well in both measurement domains :-).


39 posted on 10/21/2016 6:10:10 PM PDT by edh (I need a better tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Dusting off the Slim Whitman...


40 posted on 10/21/2016 6:12:27 PM PDT by Molon Labbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson