First, I’m not arguing, appreciate the exchange.
“A narcissist embodies self love.” => When their plans are in effect and working. When their devices are working, they literally implode to a pity party. They need “supply”. Your probably familiar with the term.
Hillary gets zip-zero “supply” from the people she’s surrounded with for days weeks on end. Again, she doesn’t have to be persuasive, polite, respectful -forget kind. She tells the SS to get out of her way. They are dirt.
She has an idealized view of her (Aliniski-it’s) mission, that’s her plan. When the mission is in effect, all else is forgive, this is the rationalization. NARSASSISTS BELIEVE THEIR OWN BS WHEN THEIR PLANS ARE WORKING. When those plans aren’t working or no plan is in effect, introspection creaps in, the better angels in a major of speaking, and the rationalizations crumble.
If Hillary wins, everything will be rationalized as needed to expedite the process or be expediatant.
If she loses, the facade caves in and she’s burried in the rubble -without the means to rationalize.
Are => aren’t ...first paragraph (on a phone here).
Sorry again, fat fingers on the phone: Alinski-it’s => Alinski-ite
Malignant Narcissism is not the only personality disorder. Hillary simply does not fit that template, period.
An MN is created, not born. Malignant Narcissism is a response to early childhood pain, neglect, abandonment and/or abuse of unendurable proportions. Obama has a classic MN-creating background; Hillary does not.
To cope with a crushing, debilitating childhood, an MN detaches from his/her emotions, and then creates an alternative reality for themselves. We see this in Obama, who for decades told everyone he was born in Kenya, and who idolized his drunken, abusive, absentee father. Hillary exhibits no similar behavior.
Hillary has a fundamental personality disorder; it’s just not Malignant Narcissism.
I’m done with this discussion; best to you.